Philosophy
What would Catholic philosopher Thomas Aquinas say about Adam and Eve and paleontology?
Wm Lane Craig on Systematic Philosophical Theology
He has a book that seems to be forthcoming. Here is a Talbot introductory lecture: He has a Q&A: A key clip: Notice, a paper, here. Excerpting Dr Clinton: Ostensibly, the reason for a ‘system’ of theology is that someone, or some group, has come to understand the teachings of the Bible and of their church in a distinctive, organized way, and is ready to share that organized thinking with their church and the world. Such systems grow much more intricate and complex when they add the results of the first three councils, historical theology, integration of thinking outside any one specific approach, and broader interaction with human experience.Logic informs all such conceptual systems. But far more than logical thinking Read More ›
Has anything been learned from nearly two decades of keening about science’s replication crisis?
C. S. Lewis and the limits of science
John West on C. S. Lewis and science
Following the science seen as “impossible and stupid”
Is the real problem with science education today lack of support for the Consensus?
What blocks new ideas in science?
Francis Schaeffer’s “line of despair” model of our civilisation’s intellectual history:
We can adapt Francis Schaeffer’s themes, looking back to the Christian Synthesis of the heritage of Jerusalem, Greece and Rome, and the onward flow of ideas and cultural agendas since Paul of Tarsus: Schaeffer thought that once there was an upper/lower storey approach that in effect gave up on solving the problem of the one and the many, the lower storey would eat up the upper one, unity and coherence would disintegrate: Schaeffer and others also thought in terms of the seven mountains picture of the span of culture, how the dominant view sets the agenda and how cultures therefore change. This has been championed by Wallnau and others in recent years. I adapt: We may carry this onward to Read More ›