Category: Peer review
Too late, the New York Times discovers what science has become?
| April 17, 2012 | Posted by News under News, Peer review |
“Another example surely is the parade of “missing link” stories that supposedly corroborate a Darwinian evolution script.” more
A friend wonders why this particular scientist is still working …
| April 11, 2012 | Posted by News under News, Peer review |
Readers, please, if you never take anything else away from Uncommon Descent, learn this: A world where Darwinism is unquestioned can be a dangerous place for human beings. more
ID-friendly peer-reviewed paper in Theoretical Biology and Medical Modelling
| April 4, 2012 | Posted by News under Intelligent Design, Peer review |
Biological information frequently manifests its “meaning” through instruction or actual production of formal bio-function. Such information is called Prescriptive Information (PI). more
Peer review: Of 53 landmark publications, 47 could not be replicated
| April 1, 2012 | Posted by News under Intelligent Design, News, Peer review |
“papers in top journals, from reputable labs ” more
It’s not just us: “Academic publishing is broken”
| March 19, 2012 | Posted by News under News, Peer review |
Taxpayers who can’t afford to pay what the journal charges for articles are actually funding all this. more
Were we talking about peer review earlier?
| March 14, 2012 | Posted by News under News, Peer review |
“Right from the title, the Demoman knew your paper had to be rejected.” more
Mathematicians and researchers to boycott Elsevier journals?
| February 11, 2012 | Posted by News under News, Peer review, Science |
Nearly 5,000 researchers have joined him. But it’s not clear how – or whether – a boycott would work. more
Memo to Discovery Institute: 50 peer-reviewed ID-friendly papers won’t make any difference
| February 10, 2012 | Posted by News under News, Peer review |
Getting past peer review just means that the in crowd doesn’t need you to fail just now. more
Appeals to the authority of science are like appeals to the authority of the stock market.
| February 9, 2012 | Posted by News under News, Peer review, Science |
You know it’s real science if it could be wrong. more
Wikipedian Darwinism: Higher Truth edits out lower-case truths
| February 6, 2012 | Posted by News under Culture, Darwinism, Intelligent Design, News, Peer review |
… the sort of person who would erase the corrections and substitute boilerplate talking points actually does know that he is bending or breaking the truth. And he probably feels okay with that. more
“Intelligent design theorists don’t publish in peer reviewed journals”
| February 1, 2012 | Posted by News under Peer review |
Incidentally: An updated list of ID papers in peer reviewed journals. more
Peer review: Both authors and ghostwriters liable for fraud, in ghostwritten medical articles?
| January 25, 2012 | Posted by News under Intelligent Design, News, Peer review |
Shape of things to come elsewhere? more
Biting back at “bite-size” science …
| January 15, 2012 | Posted by News under News, Peer review |
Quibble: The results that the journals find “exciting” and “newsworthy” are usually “novel” only in a very restricted sense: They are pushing the envelope of what is already believed. more
Is this where science fraud begins?
| January 14, 2012 | Posted by News under News, Peer review |
The most likely reason is that the educators involved do not believe that anyone has made a free choice to cheat or that cheating is an ethical issue. more
Red wine researcher fabricates masses of data …
| January 13, 2012 | Posted by News under News, Peer review |
” … more than 100 acts of data fabrication and falsification, the university said Wednesday, throwing much of his work into doubt.” more
Who’s the most common type of scientific miscreant?
| December 26, 2011 | Posted by News under News, Peer review |
“a bright and ambitious young man working in an elite institution in a rapidly moving and highly competitive branch of modern biology or medicine … ” more
How can we end the scandals in science if we misrepresent their cause?
| December 10, 2011 | Posted by News under Intelligent Design, News, Peer review, Psychology, Science |
We are awash in attention-getting studies claiming all kinds of rubbish. more
Settled science is a Cadillac for fraudsters
| December 8, 2011 | Posted by News under News, Peer review, Science |
Don’t pay taxes while falling for this. more
Will data sharing reduce the number of research scandals?
| December 1, 2011 | Posted by News under News, Peer review |
“Reanalyses of statistics in published psychology papers show frequent errors, and the more reluctant authors are to share their data, the more likely it is that their papers will contain mistakes.” more
A scientist explains the problem with bias in science
| November 26, 2011 | Posted by News under News, Peer review, Science |
It’s much easier to be wrong than right in science. We can think up many ways the world might work; only one is correct. more