Category: Peer review

Too late, the New York Times discovers what science has become?

“Another example surely is the parade of “missing link” stories that supposedly corroborate a Darwinian evolution script.” more

A friend wonders why this particular scientist is still working …

Readers, please, if you never take anything else away from Uncommon Descent, learn this: A world where Darwinism is unquestioned can be a dangerous place for human beings. more

ID-friendly peer-reviewed paper in Theoretical Biology and Medical Modelling

Biological information frequently manifests its “meaning” through instruction or actual production of formal bio-function. Such information is called Prescriptive Information (PI). more

Peer review: Of 53 landmark publications, 47 could not be replicated

“papers in top journals, from reputable labs ” more

It’s not just us: “Academic publishing is broken”

Taxpayers who can’t afford to pay what the journal charges for articles are actually funding all this. more

Were we talking about peer review earlier?

“Right from the title, the Demoman knew your paper had to be rejected.” more

Mathematicians and researchers to boycott Elsevier journals?

Nearly 5,000 researchers have joined him. But it’s not clear how – or whether – a boycott would work. more

Memo to Discovery Institute: 50 peer-reviewed ID-friendly papers won’t make any difference

Getting past peer review just means that the in crowd doesn’t need you to fail just now. more

Appeals to the authority of science are like appeals to the authority of the stock market.

You know it’s real science if it could be wrong. more

Wikipedian Darwinism: Higher Truth edits out lower-case truths

… the sort of person who would erase the corrections and substitute boilerplate talking points actually does know that he is bending or breaking the truth. And he probably feels okay with that. more

“Intelligent design theorists don’t publish in peer reviewed journals”

Incidentally: An updated list of ID papers in peer reviewed journals. more

Peer review: Both authors and ghostwriters liable for fraud, in ghostwritten medical articles?

Shape of things to come elsewhere? more

Biting back at “bite-size” science …

Quibble: The results that the journals find “exciting” and “newsworthy” are usually “novel” only in a very restricted sense: They are pushing the envelope of what is already believed. more

Is this where science fraud begins?

The most likely reason is that the educators involved do not believe that anyone has made a free choice to cheat or that cheating is an ethical issue. more

Red wine researcher fabricates masses of data …

” … more than 100 acts of data fabrication and falsification, the university said Wednesday, throwing much of his work into doubt.” more

Who’s the most common type of scientific miscreant?

“a bright and ambitious young man working in an elite institution in a rapidly moving and highly competitive branch of modern biology or medicine … ” more

How can we end the scandals in science if we misrepresent their cause?

We are awash in attention-getting studies claiming all kinds of rubbish. more

Settled science is a Cadillac for fraudsters

Don’t pay taxes while falling for this. more

Will data sharing reduce the number of research scandals?

“Reanalyses of statistics in published psychology papers show frequent errors, and the more reluctant authors are to share their data, the more likely it is that their papers will contain mistakes.” more

A scientist explains the problem with bias in science

It’s much easier to be wrong than right in science. We can think up many ways the world might work; only one is correct. more

« Previous PageNext Page »