Category: Intelligent Design
LNC: “Yes or No”
| February 11, 2012 | Posted by Barry Arrington under Intelligent Design |
Let’s clear up this law of noncontradiction issue between StephenB and eigenstate once and for all. StephenB asks eigenstate: “Can the planet Jupiter exist and not exist at the same time in the same sense? That’s a “yes or no” question eigenstate. How do you answer it? Update: I am reserving the first comment of the thread exclusively… more
Genes Have Play, Stop and Pause Buttons
| February 11, 2012 | Posted by Cornelius Hunter under Intelligent Design |
You probably remember from biology class that genes hold information that is used to construct protein and RNA molecules which do various tasks in the cell. A gene is copied in a process known as transcription. In the case of a protein-coding gene the transcript is edited and converted into a protein in a process… more
Tom Bethell on Noam Chomsky’s dissent from Darwin
| February 11, 2012 | Posted by News under Darwinism, Intelligent Design, language |
“Others within the academy who must deal with Darwinism may find themselves in the same position but less willing to say so openly.” more
Discovery Institute 2012 Summer Seminars, JULY 6-14, 2012 Seattle, WA
| February 10, 2012 | Posted by Jonathan M under Intelligent Design |
Two years ago, I had the tremendous opportunity to travel to Seattle, Washington, and take part in Discovery Institute’s yearly summer seminar for undergraduate and graduate students. Truth be told, it was one of the most memorable experiences of my life. I had the chance to interact at a one-on-one level with key ID scholars… more
Yeti’s House is Safe
| February 10, 2012 | Posted by Barry Arrington under Intelligent Design |
Anyone remember how the UN panel assured us the Himalayan glaciers would melt completely in 25 years? Now we know they are not melting at all. Do you think all the climate alarmists are slapping their foreheads and yelling ”Doh! Maybe I should reevaluate my position”? Me neither. more
Philosopher offers a new concept for “reconciling evolution and intelligent design”
| February 10, 2012 | Posted by News under Intelligent Design, News, Philosophy |
“Intelligently designed” means – at minimum – that a product’s form or attributes require a level of information that we only experience as an outcome of intelligence. more
Ya Can’t Make This Stuff Up!
| February 9, 2012 | Posted by Barry Arrington under Intelligent Design |
In response to my last post DrREC wrote: “what is Barry Arrington’s exposure to the practice of science that trumps that of a scientist who has “been around the scientific block” as he put it?” This is unintentionally hilarious. In the post I criticized scientists who appeal to authority instead of evidence and logic. DrREC, a… more
What Scientists Really Do
| February 9, 2012 | Posted by Barry Arrington under Intelligent Design |
In a comment to a recent post Dr. Liddle wrote: “Scientists do not appeal to authority; they appeal to evidence and argument, and all their conclusions are provisional, not absolute.” I will grant that Dr. Liddle’s statement summarizes fairly what scientists should do, but I am astonished that anyone – much less someone who has… more
2012 Oklahoma bill requires critical thinking in science education
| February 9, 2012 | Posted by News under Evolution, Intelligent Design, News, science education |
“critical thinking, logical analysis, open and objective discussion of scientific theories including, but not limited to, evolution, the origin of life, global warming, and human cloning” more
Frog Genome Shares Substantial Similarities With Mammalian Genomes
| February 9, 2012 | Posted by Cornelius Hunter under Intelligent Design |
Ten years ago work began on sequencing the first amphibian genome. The organism of choice was Xenopus tropicalis, a two inch frog native to Sub-Saharan Africa. And when the finished product was analyzed it was found to share substantial similarities with mammalian genomes, including our own. As one headline put it, “Frogs and humans are kissing cousins.” As… more
Did Fish Evolve From Terrestrial Creatures? Science 1, Mr. Limpet 0
| February 8, 2012 | Posted by Cornelius Hunter under Intelligent Design |
If you thought it strange that those incredible whales and dolphins are supposed to have evolved from freshwater and ultimately terrestrial environments then you’ll be amazed to hear that evolutionists are now saying the same is true for the majority of fish in the ocean. As they explain: Read more more
Researchers have reconstructed the song of a Jurassic cricket …
| February 7, 2012 | Posted by News under Intelligent Design |
Perfect for the sleep of the dinosaurs … listen. more
Depew paper tries to soften the blow: “We would be the last to suggest that Darwinism can’t reform and reframe itself yet again.”
| February 7, 2012 | Posted by News under Darwinism, Intelligent Design, News, Science |
“We would be the last to suggest that Darwinism can’t reform and reframe itself yet again.” The “last to suggest”? Oh come on! more
Here’s more, from the literature, on those 760 million year old fossil sponges
| February 7, 2012 | Posted by News under Evolution, Intelligent Design, News |
“That these organisms arose prior to the ‘snowball earth’2 and survived its extremes, presents a challenge to contemporary scientific thought.” more
Evolution is a Big Word, Part 2: Diving Deeper into the Theories of Evolution
| February 6, 2012 | Posted by johnnyb under Intelligent Design |
In the article Evolution is a Big Word, I cover several issues. In our last installment, we discussed what the multiplicity of theories means for the claims of a consensus opinion about evolution. In this installment, I wanted to talk about the theories themselves. There are several questions I would like to propose to our… more
Wikipedian Darwinism: Higher Truth edits out lower-case truths
| February 6, 2012 | Posted by News under Culture, Darwinism, Intelligent Design, News, Peer review |
… the sort of person who would erase the corrections and substitute boilerplate talking points actually does know that he is bending or breaking the truth. And he probably feels okay with that. more
Latest issue of Synthese: Should scientists even try to define life?
| February 5, 2012 | Posted by News under Biology, Intelligent Design, News |
“I conclude that scientists, philosophers, and ethicists should discard the project of defining life.” more
Evolution is a Big Word, Part 1: Is There a Consensus?
| February 5, 2012 | Posted by johnnyb under Intelligent Design |
With so many theories of evolution floating about, is there really a consensus of opinion? A new article looks at this closely. more
The “connectome”: This is your brain on wiring
| February 5, 2012 | Posted by News under Intelligent Design, Neuroscience, News |
If the connectome doesn’t kill neuroscience, it may teach it something. more
What Catholics didn’t like about Darwin – and still don’t
| February 5, 2012 | Posted by O'Leary under Darwinism, Intelligent Design, News, Religion |
Darwinism is now a sea of nonsense and contradiction, and fighting the sea is not a day’s work. more