Category: Evolutionary biology
|February 4, 2015||Posted by News under Animal minds, Evolutionary biology, News|
Anyway, Mr. Raid has a personality too.
|November 28, 2014||Posted by PaV under Evolutionary biology, Genetics, Genomics, Intelligent Design|
This is from a new study published in Nature Communications, and talked about at Phys.Org. Oh, how difficult it is these days to be an “intellectually fulfilled” neo-Darwinian: Humans don’t like being alone, and their genes are no different. Together we are stronger, and the two versions of a gene – one from each parent […]
|November 7, 2014||Posted by William J Murray under Darwinism, Darwinist rhetorical tactics, Evolution, Evolutionary biology, General interest, Intelligent Design, Logic and First Principles of right reason, The Design of Life, Tree of life|
Keith brought in an argument he claimed to be a “bomb” for ID. It turned out to be a failed suicide mission where the only person that got blown up was Keith. (Please note: I am assuming that life patterns exists in an ONH, as Keith claims, for the sake of this argument only. Also, […]
FYI-FTR: But, Wiki and Theobald’s 29+ evidences prove evolution is the best explanation of life and its branching tree pattern! — NOT
|November 5, 2014||Posted by kairosfocus under Atheism, Cambrian explosion, Darwinist rhetorical tactics, Evolutionary biology, Functionally Specified Complex Information & Organization, FYI-FTR, ID Foundations, Origin Of Life, Science, worldview issues/foundations and society, UD's Pro-Darwinism essay Challenge||
In recent exchanges in and around UD on origins and the tree of life, Theobald’s 29 evidences claims (and by implication the sort of summary presented by Wikipedia in its articles on Abiogenesis and Evolution) have come up. [NB: to carry forward discussions, I suggest here on. I intend to do a for reference in […]
|October 31, 2014||Posted by News under Evolutionary biology, Intelligent Design, News|
If an establishment figure can safely write this kind of thing, Darwin’s theory is coming under more serious fire than ever.
|October 10, 2014||Posted by News under Evolutionary biology, Intelligent Design, News|
The problem isn’t that it is imperialistic but that so few of these forays are supported by science, as traditionally understood.
|September 17, 2014||Posted by News under Evolutionary biology, Intelligent Design, News|
But is the hippo in the vid not swimming?
|July 24, 2014||Posted by scordova under Evolutionary biology, News, Physics|
Coyne is not an engineer. He’s sort of a glorified fruitfly farmer. He doesn’t have engineering insights and it shows. He’s also one of the most militant ideologues out there ( protesting the appointment of Francis Collins MD,PhD as head of NIH because Collins was a Christian). Jerry Coyne argues the human eyes is poorly […]
|July 2, 2014||Posted by News under Evolutionary biology, News|
Abstract: The evolution of sex is one of the most important and controversial problems in evolutionary biology.
|May 8, 2014||Posted by News under Evolutionary biology, Intelligent Design, News|
A reasonable interpretation of the past is conventionally called history. Why, lacking an ability to predict events in the present, should it be called science?
|January 22, 2014||Posted by johnnyb under Evolution, Evolutionary biology, Informatics, Intelligent Design|
One of my favorite biologists is Gunter Wagner. He makes the claim in Genome Biology and Evolution that evolvability and modularity are highly associated. While not proof of a requirement, I think that Wagner is on the right track. In fact, this sort of research can actually bridge the gap between Intelligent Design and Evolutionary […]
|December 16, 2013||Posted by PaV under Biography, Convergent evolution, Darwinism, Evolutionary biology, Intelligent Design|
An expert in “frog evolution” has demonstrated that frogs in different continents “evolved” the same sorts of characteristics. Now just ask yourself: what are the odds that “evolution,” which works via random processes, would “evolve” the same kinds of characteristics on different continents? Yet, that is what our evolutionary biologist friends would ask us to […]
|November 26, 2013||Posted by Joshua G under Creationism, Darwinism, Darwinist rhetorical tactics, Design inference, Evolutionary biology, Naturalism, Philosophy, Religion, Science|
My neo-Darwinian friend, Francis Smallwood, has now written a response to my previous instalment in our dialogue. If you want to read it, go here. Below is a small excerpt of the response by Francis. You can read his full response by going to his blog. Follow the link at the bottom of the page. […]
|November 25, 2013||Posted by News under Ecology, Evolutionary biology, News|
Let’s not lose sight of this: Before the Siats fossil was found, a whole narrative existed of late Cretaceous ecology that got started entirely in ignorance of this top predator. That would be like trying to understand the northern wilderness without the wolf or the bear.
|November 9, 2013||Posted by DLH under Cell biology, Complex Specified Information, Darwinism, Evolution, Evolutionary biology, Genetics, Genomics, Intelligent Design, Irreducible Complexity, Origin Of Life, speciation, Symbiosis|
Bacteria demonstrate intra-species communication that is species specific using a partner with a communication molecule. Bacteria are also “multilingual” with a generic trade language for interspecies communication. Bacteria control tasks by signal producing and receiving receptors with a signal carrier. The tasks bacteria conduct depend on the concentration they sense of self bacteria versus generic […]
|October 3, 2013||Posted by PaV under Darwinism, Epigenetics, Evolutionary biology, Genetics|
In today’s Phys.Org news page, we hear about a three nucleotide change in the organism “Trypanosoma brucei, a parasite that causes sleeping sickness in Africa and Chagas disease in Latin America.” Immediately after “transcription”, via a completely unknown mechanism, a three nucleotide portion of the intron associated with …… is replaced by three different nucleotides. […]
|September 12, 2013||Posted by scordova under Darwinism, Evolution, Evolutionary biology|
While having lunch at ICC 2013 with biologist and genetic engineer Robert Carter and the unnamed evolutionary biologist who got laughed off stage (let us call him Erik), I raised a question which the evolutionary biologist and other Darwinists (including Michael Lynch) have not provided satisfactory answers for, namely, “what is the evolutionary simulation that […]
|August 13, 2013||Posted by DonaldM under Atheism, Biology, Culture, Darwinism, Evolution, Evolutionary biology, Evolutionary psychology, Naturalism, Philosophy, Religion, Science, Science, Philosophy and (Natural) Theology|
On August 6th, Steven Pinker, the well-known Psychology Professor from Harvard, had an article in New Republic entitled Science is Not Your Enemy, in which he lambasts those who decry scientists for propounding scientism. You’d expect rebuttals of Pinker to come from the likes of Wesley J. Smith who indeed took Pinker to task in […]
|June 26, 2013||Posted by DonaldM under Darwinism, Evolution, Evolutionary biology, Intelligent Design, Philosophy, Science|
Over at his Why Evolution is True website, the infamous Jerry Coyne has given his lame excuses for not wanting to take up a genuine offer from ENV’s David Klinghoffer to debate and discuss Steve Meyer’s latest Book Darwin’s Doubt as well as discussing anything else Darwin related. In his “I’m too busy and important to […]
|June 21, 2013||Posted by DonaldM under Biology, Cambrian explosion, Darwinism, Design inference, Evolution, Evolutionary biology, Informatics, pre-Cambrian, Tree of life|
In the comments of this UD post from yesterday, (comment #21) I referred to Nick Matzke’s rant over at the Panda’s Thumb yesterday as yet another illustration of the double standard’s Matzke’s has when it comes to his critiques of anyone who dares challenge Darwinian Orthodoxy. In my comments yesterday, I gave an example of […]