11 May 2008
Mario A. Lopez
From Darwin and design: historical essay:
“The only distinct meaning of the word ‘natural’ is stated , fixed or settled ; since what is natural as much requires and presupposes an intelligent agent to render it so, i.e. to effect it continually or at stated times, as what is supernatural or miraculous does to effect it […]
Posted in Intelligent Design, Evolution | 12 Comments »
6 May 2008
William Dembski
Critics of the ID movement often complain that we’re fabulously well funded by right-wing extremists and in it for our own aggrandizement. Fortunately, money leaves a trail. When one follows it, Darwinists seem to be doing much better financially than ID theorists (perhaps an indication that they are serving Mammon more faithfully). Let’s consider a […]
Posted in Darwinism, Intelligent Design, Evolution | 22 Comments »
3 May 2008
scordova
The same day I first watched “Expelled” in theaters, I also watched the movie “21″. The movie “21″ is based on the true story of MIT students who made a fortune in Las Vegas casinos through the use of mathematics.
The real story behind the movie began with an associate of Claude Shannon by the […]
Posted in Science, Comp. Sci. / Eng., Darwinism, Intelligent Design, Evolution | 123 Comments »
29 April 2008
William Dembski
Derbyshire continues to embarrass himself — it’s as though on the topic of ID and God his emotions take over and he can’t think straight. I’ll spare you his review and simply quote Berlinski’s response, which skillfully shuts him down with very few words:
[From] David Berlinski:
1 If I remark that no sane man would […]
Posted in Expelled, Atheism, Science, Religion, Philosophy, Evolution | 33 Comments »
26 April 2008
William Dembski
This just published at the STANFORD REVIEW:
The Impact of Darwinism
By Tristan Abbey
With the premiere of Ben Stein’s new movie, Expelled, many people are pondering the long-term impact of Darwinism on society. We touched base with two experts on the subject. Arguing that Darwinism has had a largely positive impact on society is Michael Ruse, the […]
Posted in Expelled, Intelligent Design, Evolution | 84 Comments »
18 April 2008
William Dembski
The demise of religion is for Steven Weinberg the most important contribution of science.
Posted in Expelled, Darwinism, Evolution | 121 Comments »
18 April 2008
DLH
Research often shows no apparent effect (phenotype) of deleting most genes. Hillenmeyer et al now find that 97% of yeast genes have an important biological function. Optimal growth requires nearly all genes in absence of “rich” medium in the lab. Sounds like robust design.
Posted in Intelligent Design, Biology, Evolution | 1 Comment »
17 April 2008
DLH
Per recommendations, here is a separate thread on:
Michael Le Page weighing in at New Scientist with:
Evolution: 24 myths and misconceptions
18:00 16 April 2008
He provides the mother pie statement that:
Darwin presented compelling evidence for evolution in On the Origin and, since his time, the case has become overwhelming. . . . Evolution is as firmly […]
Posted in Creationism, Science, Darwinism, Evolution | 21 Comments »
16 April 2008
DLH
Richard Weikart summarizes his devastating research into the Darwinian foundations of Nazis - and the continuation of those themes by modern evolutionists.
———————————————
Darwin and the Nazis
By Richard Weikart Published 4/16/2008 12:07:03 AM American Spectator
Richard Dawkins, PZ Myers, and some other Darwinists are horrified that the forthcoming documentary, Expelled: No Intelligence Allowed, will […]
Posted in Expelled, Darwinism, Intelligent Design, Philosophy, Evolution | 164 Comments »
13 April 2008
William Dembski
[[This blast from the past was originally published here at UD 25oct06. With EXPELLED coming out so soon and given Dawkins’s prominent role in it, I thought it worth moving to the top of the stack (blogs have the data structure of a push-down stack). –WmAD]]
Last night Richard Dawkins did a reading from his new […]
Posted in Science, Religion, Darwinism, Philosophy, Evolution | 94 Comments »
4 April 2008
scordova
Consider the following claims:
Darwinism requires that the Fundamental Theorem [of Natural Selection] does not apply most of the time.
Walter ReMine
Biotic Message
and
a relative lack of natural selection may be the prerequisite for major evolutionary advance
Mae Wan Ho
Beyond neo-Darwinism
and
Concerning this theory [Darwinian evolution], I believe that we might question (or at least note) the following:
….
(10) The […]
Posted in Darwinism, Intelligent Design, Evolution | 75 Comments »
1 April 2008
DLH
Researchers have discovered two proteins essential for reproductive cells to latch onto each other and then to fuse. Changing at least one of these proteins appears to prevent species from interbreeding. This appears to open up a way to stop malaria. A new species would appear to require at least two changed genes, one for […]
Posted in Irreducible Complexity, Intelligent Design, Evolution | 5 Comments »
31 March 2008
William Dembski
Here’s the conclusion of Jonathan Wells’s review of Francis Collins’s THE LANGUAGE OF GOD:
Darwin of the gaps
Recall Collins’s principal objection to ID: “ID is a ‘God of the gaps’ theory, inserting a supposition of the need for supernatural intervention in places that its proponents claim science cannot explain… But those theories have a dismal history. […]
Posted in Darwinism, Intelligent Design, Evolution | 26 Comments »
12 March 2008
Mario A. Lopez
John Wakeley1
Abstract
Arising from: N. Patterson, D. J. Richter, S. Gnerre, E. Lander & D. Reich Nature 441, 1103–1108 (2006); Patterson et al.
Genetic data from two or more species provide information about the process of speciation. In their analysis of DNA from humans, chimpanzees, gorillas, orangutans and macaques (HCGOM), Patterson et al.1 suggest that the apparently […]
Posted in Darwinism, Biology, Evolution | 571 Comments »
6 March 2008
Granville Sewell
As every child in our public school system knows, all critics of neo-Darwinism are religious fanatics. Except those who aren’t, such as University of Madrid biologist Maximo Sandin, whose dislike for Darwinism seem to be as much based on its association with capitalism (here) as with its inconsistency with the fossil record […]
Posted in Darwinism, Evolution | 29 Comments »