Category: Darwinism

Debunking Stephen Jay Gould

It was Gould who was making most of the errors in his paper analysis … more

Darwinists anxious to avoid blame in Aurora, Colorado, theatre massacre

In those mass murders where Darwin has been blamed, the accused was actually invoking Darwin himself. more

Why no one can confute Darwinism and, consequently, no one should believe it

Mike’s open, Carl. more

Oh, and in other news, science writer Carl Zimmer noviews Science and Human Origins

Darwinists can get away with that in the present state of culture. They need only pretend to know what they are talking about. They don’t really have to defend it. more

Ann, Darwinists dispute whatever they need to, like used car salesmen defending a lemon you bought.

Don’t even discuss it with them if you don’t have a big, stupid guy with you or, much better, a lawyer. more

The maverick rabbi on what happens when materialist atheists run for office

There is an enormous spiritual gulf … It is one or the other; there is no middle ground here. more

The risks when scientists avoid critical thinking

Like, what should we do when someone says, “I want to know whether this kid is a boy or a girl because, I don’t want any girls in my family.” more

And they say Darwinism isn’t a religion …

Note how the Times writer throws in the fact that Darwin, who is practically worshipped now for explaining how new species arise, didn’t really do that. more

We wuz wrong! Darwinist claim about 500 million year old gene was way shoddier than we thought …

“The artificial gene was not 500 million years old. In fact, its inferred DNA sequence … depended heavily on the neo-Darwinian assumptions with which the researchers began.” more

Scientists, including evolutionary biologists, carry coffin through streets in Canada, to protest cuts to funding?

Two things most readers won’t necessarily know: Darwin’s boys have been after science minister Gary Goodyear for years, believing him to be a “creationist.” more

Scientists are beginning to forget Darwin, whether they admit it or not.

“All of them [recent science papers] speak in machine terms (nanomachine, rotation, motor, mechanism, architecture) but none of them have much to say about evolution.” more

In other news: Richard Dawkins on Al Jazeera TV?

“Dawkins quickly set the producers straight on the topic at hand: ‘Is there room for creationism (not religion) in science.’” more

Darwin and primitive peoples: A more nuanced view

“These descriptions compare strangely with Darwin’s ignorant, derogatory, and racist comments in the same Journal concerning the Fuegians he encountered when the Beagle reached Tierra del Fuego a year later in December 1832. ” more

He said it: Phillip Johnson on the true “ID vs. Darwinism” conflict. Nail. Head.

For scientific materialists the materialism comes first; the science comes thereafter. [Emphasis original] We might more accurately term them “materialists employing science.” And if materialism is true, then some materialistic theory of evolution has to be true simply as a matter of logical deduction, regardless of the evidence. That theory will necessarily be at least… more

Should capitalists espouse intelligent design? Versa vice?

“Capitalism is unjustified within a materialistic worldview.” more

In a rare instance, the design of life turned a man to terrorism, but …

… his “human conscience reasserted itself” more

Have you stopped thinking yet?

Am I – just some politician who claims I’d waste less of your tax dollar than the other guy – being asked to assent to a proposition I don’t clearly understand? more

Physicist Rob Sheldon offers some thoughts on Sal Cordova vs. Granville Sewell on 2nd Law Thermo

“My (Nobel nominated) college professor used to ask a rhetorical question in his thermo class, ‘what is the entropy change of a cow after the butcher put a 22 calibre bullet through the brain?’” more

Granville Sewell responds to Sal Cordova

“Obviously the origin and evolution of life do not violate the second law as stated in the early formulations you quote, but there are many formulations of this law, some more general than others.” more

Attention Darwin’s male fishwives: We’re on to you. And it’s not working.

There’s some stuff Darwinists just can’t fool people about. They can’t be their own worst advertisement, make a huge public noise, and expect no one to notice or draw any conclusions. more

« Previous PageNext Page »