Category: Darwinism

2007: Darwinist efforts to stifle the ID community are beginning to fail

Gonzalez, for example, continued a productive publishing career in the study of exoplanets at Grove City College, and Marks continued to undermine Darwinism by his skeptical computer studies at Baylor. more

2008: Lots of people doubt Darwin that you didn’t think would, and are not afraid to say so

By now many people know there is something wrong with Darwinism – but these people were in a position to learn that through their work. Not through mainstream media. more

2009: The modern (neo-Darwinian) synthesis is – safely – admitted to be fading

Darwinists commonly react to these developments by announcing that “Most of those people don’t agree with ID” – apparently unable to comprehend that that’s a much bigger problem for them than for the ID theorist. more

2010: Layer on layer of intricacy outstrips Darwinian just-so stories

Meanwhile, the enforcement arm of Darwinism, both official and freelance, has been losing a string of cases, starting in late 2010. more

California Science Center, Darwin, and the real world of insurance

It’s a rare planet on which you can get into a needless squabble due to scuffing your obligations, stick your insurer with the bill, and not expect to see your rates go up. more

Ann Coulter on the dog that ate Darwin’s fossils

Put another way, if the Cambrian is not a problem for Darwinism, Darwinism is not science. All real theories have problems, but Darwinism, like any cult, never has any problems – because evidence always takes second place to cult beliefs. more

Jewish scientists who are not Darwinists

There’s a world out there that is not Darwin’s. more

Major media are written or broadcast mainly for government now

The principal audience of legacy mainstream media today is expanded government and its supporters. more

Darwin’s contribution to Deep Original Thought – and why it is no use

Yes, evolutionary theorist Wilson decided to descend from his ivory tower eminence and try to fix a has-been town and its religion. Never a dragon-filled moat around when you need one …. more

Carnivorous plants: After eating Darwin, they couldn’t resist further culinary adventures

Can you blame them? He was delicious and it was fun. more

Losing no time staking his share of the Darwin-doubting vote, Ron Paul says, I don’t accept the theory of evolution

Conceivably, he doesn’t realize it but the bar right now is not set at what the candidate believes, but at whether he is willing to stand up to the Darwin lobby’s claim of exclusive rights to public goods and services, and compulsory access to students in school, and none others allowed. more

Latest findings show: We are all humans now, and the missing link is still missing

The emotional hunger of Darwin-driven science to find new human species (especially, unusually simian ones) has led to an amusing search for terminology to describe minimal differences. The word choices can be fun. more

California Science Center answerable for canning non-Darwin film

Figures the official Darwinists would arise from their leather-bottomed chairs to try to suppress a film that shows the public the knowledge that the science czars were depriving us of. This time it did not work. more

Francis Schaeffer expert offers the facts on Michele Bachman, Francis Schaeffer, and “Dominionism.”

What’s ironic is that so many worry about attack ads and so few worry about articles that purport to provide news coverage, but are essentially attack ads. more

Is “human biodiversity studies” another name for racism?

Something doesn’t sound quite right here. Why would “HBD” be necessary to explain why post-1960s liberalism doesn’t work? more

Deprogramming from the dead tree media’s worldview – one adverb at a time

Of course, some adverbs do convey information. Consider “fatally” vs. “fatefully.” = fact vs. opinion more

Ann Coulter: The demand that US prez hopefuls profess faith in Darwin is “flash mob method of scientific inquiry”

Darwin forgives them all their sins because, “evolutionarily,” they can’t help it. Louis Vuitton would say there’s No Free Lunch and make them pay their bills for his stuff. more

Richard Dawkins’ basic problem is with a democratic process, period

richard-dawkins_145x100

Like any autocrat worldwide, Dawkins iterates endlessly anew the wonders of Darwin’s theory – as if the theory itself compels assent without evidence. If Americans want more of that, on just about any subject, they can vote for the candidates he approves. more

Finally some straight talk: Serious evolution is NOT happening just because small changes are noted vs. last decade

The problem seems to be that researchers were pouncing on small and easily reversible changes, and declaring them to be “evolution.” more

Evolution And Probabilities: A Response to Jason Rosenhouse

I recently published an article on Uncommon Descent on the value of probabilistic arguments in the evolution debate. Mathematician and ScienceBlogs contributor Jason Rosenhouse has since responded with a rebuttal on his blog. Here, I offer a brief response. Rosenhouse writes, Jonathan M. is completely confused about what the issue is. Pigliucci certainly never claimed… more

« Previous PageNext Page »