Category: Christian Darwinism
|October 31, 2013||Posted by News under Christian Darwinism, News|
Or is there some misunderstanding? And why now, for crying out loud, when even atheists are checking out at various points?
Ran across this Biola video lecture (in course BB ST 450) on scientism in a thread from a few months back, HT BA77 as usual. I think it is well worth pondering: embedded by Embedded VideoYouTube Direkt So, thoughts? END
|August 11, 2013||Posted by News under Intelligent Design, Christian Darwinism, News|
Devil: “Hence the encouragement we have given to all those schemes of thought such as Creative Evolution, Scientific Humanism, or Communism, which fix men’s affections on the Future,”
|August 11, 2013||Posted by News under Christian Darwinism, News|
In short, Lewis means everyone knows about “Evolution” the way everyone knows about the multiverse, … second hand smoke, and Schroedinger’s cat. Half or more of all this is nonsense. Which?
|August 4, 2013||Posted by News under Christian Darwinism, News|
Rosenberg, Sommers: We must respond to Dennett’s final question “Does Darwin’s idea turn out to be, in the end, just what we need in our attempt to preserve . . . the values we cherish?” with a simple “no.”
|July 31, 2013||Posted by News under Christian Darwinism, News|
And better known than genome mapper Francis Collins.
|July 18, 2013||Posted by News under Intelligent Design, Christian Darwinism, News|
Again, the comments will heat your home in January.
|June 25, 2013||Posted by News under theistic evolution, Christian Darwinism|
There is no religious argument against ID based on imperfection if your starting point is the Jewish or Christian religion.
|June 4, 2013||Posted by News under Intelligent Design, Christian Darwinism|
Could any Darwinist, Christian or otherwise, afford a sneer-free investigation of the facts at this time?
|June 2, 2013||Posted by News under theistic evolution, Christian Darwinism|
The element in theories about evolution that is not compatible with Christianity IS Darwinism, which they defend.
|September 30, 2012||Posted by DLH under Evolution, Intelligent Design, Creationism, theistic evolution, Origin Of Life, Christian Darwinism|
Gallup has updated their origins survey: Which of the following statements comes closest to your views on the origin and development of human beings? 1) Human beings have developed over millions of years from less advanced forms of life, but God guided this process, 2) Human beings have developed over millions of years from less […]
|August 19, 2012||Posted by News under Intelligent Design, Human evolution, Christian Darwinism, News|
Since Enns thinks that his critics really need Adam to exist, does he grasp the centrality of the fact that he himself really needs him not to?
You can be a stupid Darwinist, and make it work, but you can’t be a stupid ID theorist and make it work
|August 13, 2012||Posted by News under Intelligent Design, Darwinism, Christian Darwinism, News|
The big question is, why are Christians paying for Christian Darwinism. Thoughts?
|July 24, 2012||Posted by News under Creationism, Christian Darwinism, News|
Neither Falk nor Wood have much use for design theory. So they will have something to talk about.
|July 15, 2012||Posted by O'Leary under Evolution, Christian Darwinism|
Christian Darwinists may be people who make bad investments generally. In, for example, “anything goes” theologies. Congregation-wise, everybody goes. Elsewhere.
|July 10, 2012||Posted by News under Irreducible Complexity, Christian Darwinism, News|
First of all, Venema confuses “irreducibly complex” with “essential for the viability of the organism.”
|June 12, 2012||Posted by scordova under Christian Darwinism, academic freedom|
HT: Jammer, UD commenter The Clergy Letter Project was organized to help promote Darwinism in the churches. They maintained a directory of Scientists on call to help Clergy. However the clergy letter project has a checkered past of recruiting scientists with dubious ethical standards to help spread the Gospel according to Darwin. Were it not […]
|May 16, 2012||Posted by O'Leary under Intelligent Design, Christian Darwinism|
Yes, you can shoot a ghost. It doesn’t affect the ghost, but it sure makes a difference for you.
|May 10, 2012||Posted by News under Christian Darwinism, News, Cell biology|
… dumping Darwin’s trash on us?
Further thoughts on Stephen Barr’s theistic Darwinism: Why should a “made by YHWH” tag in a cell be convincing?
|May 10, 2012||Posted by O'Leary under Christian Darwinism|
A Darwinist would say that the accidental tag explains why the illusion of design is so persistent in people’s minds … it is embedded in our cells,