Category: Christian Darwinism
If you find Darwin’s God at your church, show him the door politely, will you?
| June 4, 2013 | Posted by News under Christian Darwinism, Intelligent Design |
Could any Darwinist, Christian or otherwise, afford a sneer-free investigation of the facts at this time? more
Why “theistic evolution” should properly be called Christian Darwinism
| June 2, 2013 | Posted by News under Christian Darwinism, theistic evolution |
The element in theories about evolution that is not compatible with Christianity IS Darwinism, which they defend. more
Poll: Atheists 15% – God involved 78%
| September 30, 2012 | Posted by DLH under Christian Darwinism, Creationism, Evolution, Intelligent Design, Origin Of Life, theistic evolution |
Gallup has updated their origins survey: Which of the following statements comes closest to your views on the origin and development of human beings? 1) Human beings have developed over millions of years from less advanced forms of life, but God guided this process, 2) Human beings have developed over millions of years from less… more
“Adam never existed” theologian responds to critics
| August 19, 2012 | Posted by News under Christian Darwinism, Human evolution, Intelligent Design, News |
Since Enns thinks that his critics really need Adam to exist, does he grasp the centrality of the fact that he himself really needs him not to? more
You can be a stupid Darwinist, and make it work, but you can’t be a stupid ID theorist and make it work
| August 13, 2012 | Posted by News under Christian Darwinism, Darwinism, Intelligent Design, News |
The big question is, why are Christians paying for Christian Darwinism. Thoughts? more
Christianity Today profiles BioLogian and young Earth creationist together
| July 24, 2012 | Posted by News under Christian Darwinism, Creationism, News |
Neither Falk nor Wood have much use for design theory. So they will have something to talk about. more
Barry, it seems like the smart atheists are MOSTLY dumping Darwin now …
| July 15, 2012 | Posted by O'Leary under Christian Darwinism, Evolution |
Christian Darwinists may be people who make bad investments generally. In, for example, “anything goes” theologies. Congregation-wise, everybody goes. Elsewhere. more
Christian Darwinists get it wrong at BioLogos … but isn’t that the job they are supposed to do?
| July 10, 2012 | Posted by News under Christian Darwinism, Irreducible Complexity, News |
First of all, Venema confuses “irreducibly complex” with “essential for the viability of the organism.” more
Clergy Letter Project “Scientists on call to help Clergy” — Steve Matheson and Amy Bishop
| June 12, 2012 | Posted by scordova under academic freedom, Christian Darwinism |
HT: Jammer, UD commenter The Clergy Letter Project was organized to help promote Darwinism in the churches. They maintained a directory of Scientists on call to help Clergy. However the clergy letter project has a checkered past of recruiting scientists with dubious ethical standards to help spread the Gospel according to Darwin. Were it not… more
Memo to Darrel Falk: Take the ghost of Darwin out and shoot it. Dawn.
| May 16, 2012 | Posted by O'Leary under Christian Darwinism, Intelligent Design |
Yes, you can shoot a ghost. It doesn’t affect the ghost, but it sure makes a difference for you. more
James Shapiro: It’s hard to consider cell checkpoints purely mechanical – so why is BioLogos …
| May 10, 2012 | Posted by News under Cell biology, Christian Darwinism, News |
… dumping Darwin’s trash on us? more
Further thoughts on Stephen Barr’s theistic Darwinism: Why should a “made by YHWH” tag in a cell be convincing?
| May 10, 2012 | Posted by O'Leary under Christian Darwinism |
A Darwinist would say that the accidental tag explains why the illusion of design is so persistent in people’s minds … it is embedded in our cells, more
Thoughts on Stephen Barr’s theistic Darwinism: If God can load the dice so cleverly that no evidence would reveal it …
| May 10, 2012 | Posted by O'Leary under Christian Darwinism |
… why couldn’t he have just created the fossils all at once, to fool us or test our faith? more
Bill Dembski on his discussion with BioLogos head Darrel Falk
| May 9, 2012 | Posted by News under Christian Darwinism, Intelligent Design |
“How can [Falk] avoid the charge that the faith by which he sees God’s handiwork is merely an overlay on top of a nature that, taken by itself, is neutral or even hostile to Christian faith?” more
Memo re BioLogos: We are waiting for answers that will likely never come …
| May 8, 2012 | Posted by O'Leary under Christian Darwinism, Intelligent Design |
ID sympathizers – whatever position we take on religion – agree that it could, in principle, be about facts. That is, there can be actual fine-tuning of the universe, actual irreducible complexity, actual revelation. more
What part of naked, normal Darwinism do the BioLogians actually reject and why?
| May 7, 2012 | Posted by News under Christian Darwinism, Intelligent Design |
The BioLogians kvetch about being called Christian Darwinists. But what explicit proposition advanced by Darwinists in the science literature are they prepared to deny, based on evidence? more
Bill Dembski’s second installment at BioLogos
| May 4, 2012 | Posted by News under Christian Darwinism |
” We see this denial of teleology in Darwin’s own writings and we find it among his contemporary disciples, even among theistic evolutionists. ” more
Bill Dembski asks, Is Darwinism theologically neutral – at BioLogos (= Christians for Darwin)
| May 1, 2012 | Posted by News under Christian Darwinism, News |
So Darwinism is compatible with a Christianity where churches rise again – as some really nice condos with an airy central atrium, very hot real estate-wise. more
Should Chuck Colson really have listened to Francis Collins on ID?
| April 26, 2012 | Posted by News under Christian Darwinism, News |
Why? more
Douglas Wilson: What if Darwin’s baby is “a particularly ugly chimp that somebody smuggled into the nursery”?
| April 15, 2012 | Posted by News under Christian Darwinism, Intelligent Design, News |
“Some of us want to say, ‘Hey! That’s not baby Jane!’” more