
Can’t see the Video? Upgrade your Flash player.
Does ID presuppose a mechanistic view of nature?
Frequently Raised But Weak Arguments Against Intelligent Design
This entry was posted Wednesday, September 10th, 2008 at 10:59 am and is filed under Biology, Humor, Poe's Law. Both comments and pings are currently closed.







1
ellijacket
09/10/2008
11:06 am
Now that was funny.
2
bFast
09/10/2008
11:13 am
I’m stuck at home today looking after my two sick, and very willing to complain about it, girls.
Thanks for putting a little sunshine into my morning. This was more effective at perking me up than a pot of coffee.
BTW, in a darwinian, purposeless world, it would seem that religiocity is a darwinian product. As such, considering that there is no meaning anyway, why should scientists be at war with this clearly selected trait?
3
ellijacket
09/10/2008
12:52 pm
bFast,
That’s what I want to know. If 95% of the world believes in some ‘higher power’ and evolution chose that trait then what’s all the fuss about?
4
Apollos
09/10/2008
1:45 pm
I’m rolling!
5
Phinehas
09/10/2008
3:29 pm
“If 95% of the world believes in some ‘higher power’ and evolution chose that trait then what’s all the fuss about?”
Obviously, they are just responding in a way that will help promulgate their own selfish, materialist gene.
6
reluctantfundie
09/10/2008
5:29 pm
Put exactly what I thought in comic words.
7
Zakrzewski
09/13/2008
2:53 pm
Yet another reason Cleese has always been my favorite Python.