Comments on: Dinosaurs from birds? http://www.uncommondescent.com/biology/dinosaurs-from-birds/ Serving The Intelligent Design Community Mon, 13 Feb 2012 07:29:18 +0000 hourly 1 By: lars http://www.uncommondescent.com/biology/dinosaurs-from-birds/comment-page-1/#comment-347698 lars Sun, 14 Feb 2010 02:50:04 +0000 http://www.uncommondescent.com/?p=11707#comment-347698 Matteo: it's <a href="http://www.evolutionnews.org/2010/01/seeing_ghosts_in_the_bushes_or.html" rel="nofollow">already happened, many times</a>. DLH, thanks for the good post. Please correct extra apostrophe in title. <em> Matteo - thanks for catching the typo - fixed DLH</em> Matteo: it’s already happened, many times.

DLH, thanks for the good post.
Please correct extra apostrophe in title.

Matteo – thanks for catching the typo – fixed DLH

]]> By: Matteo http://www.uncommondescent.com/biology/dinosaurs-from-birds/comment-page-1/#comment-347684 Matteo Sat, 13 Feb 2010 23:26:51 +0000 http://www.uncommondescent.com/?p=11707#comment-347684 Sooner or later, the Darwinists are going to find that Precambrian Rabbit they're always talking about, after which they will continue on their merry way as if nothing happened. Sooner or later, the Darwinists are going to find that Precambrian Rabbit they’re always talking about, after which they will continue on their merry way as if nothing happened.

]]> By: Frost122585 http://www.uncommondescent.com/biology/dinosaurs-from-birds/comment-page-1/#comment-347677 Frost122585 Sat, 13 Feb 2010 21:30:51 +0000 http://www.uncommondescent.com/?p=11707#comment-347677 And it also further goes to show how weak the proclaimed "consensus" is on the specifics of DE as well. And it also further goes to show how weak the proclaimed “consensus” is on the specifics of DE as well.

]]> By: Frost122585 http://www.uncommondescent.com/biology/dinosaurs-from-birds/comment-page-1/#comment-347673 Frost122585 Sat, 13 Feb 2010 19:57:04 +0000 http://www.uncommondescent.com/?p=11707#comment-347673 The simple fact that these diametrically opposed versions of the neo-Darwinian synthesis even exist just further show what a mockery the supposed "overwhelming evidence" (proclaimed by the Darwinian faithful)- really is. The simple fact that these diametrically opposed versions of the neo-Darwinian synthesis even exist just further show what a mockery the supposed “overwhelming evidence” (proclaimed by the Darwinian faithful)- really is.

]]>