﻿<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Change at UD</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.uncommondescent.com/adminstrative/change-at-ud/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.uncommondescent.com/adminstrative/change-at-ud/</link>
	<description>Serving The Intelligent Design Community</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 13 Feb 2012 06:39:39 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	
	<item>
		<title>By: DougieBear</title>
		<link>http://www.uncommondescent.com/adminstrative/change-at-ud/comment-page-1/#comment-297943</link>
		<dc:creator>DougieBear</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 19 Nov 2008 03:08:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.uncommondescent.com/?p=3800#comment-297943</guid>
		<description>Even if I swim in the sea.
Or decide to plant some peas.

You will always be # 1 
By me.

Dougie.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Even if I swim in the sea.<br />
Or decide to plant some peas.</p>
<p>You will always be # 1<br />
By me.</p>
<p>Dougie.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: DougieBear</title>
		<link>http://www.uncommondescent.com/adminstrative/change-at-ud/comment-page-1/#comment-297942</link>
		<dc:creator>DougieBear</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 19 Nov 2008 01:21:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.uncommondescent.com/?p=3800#comment-297942</guid>
		<description>So long Dr. Dembski. 

You will always be,
Number 1 by me.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So long Dr. Dembski. </p>
<p>You will always be,<br />
Number 1 by me.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: bornagain77</title>
		<link>http://www.uncommondescent.com/adminstrative/change-at-ud/comment-page-1/#comment-297718</link>
		<dc:creator>bornagain77</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 15 Nov 2008 21:50:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.uncommondescent.com/?p=3800#comment-297718</guid>
		<description>A salute song for you Dr. Dembski:

Kutless- Shut Me Out

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=R_2TE7dldGs</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A salute song for you Dr. Dembski:</p>
<p>Kutless- Shut Me Out</p>
<p><a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=R_2TE7dldGs" rel="nofollow">http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=R_2TE7dldGs</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: kairos</title>
		<link>http://www.uncommondescent.com/adminstrative/change-at-ud/comment-page-1/#comment-297638</link>
		<dc:creator>kairos</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 14 Nov 2008 22:16:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.uncommondescent.com/?p=3800#comment-297638</guid>
		<description>Bill thank you very much for your invaluable work during the last year and congratulations for the recent peer reviewed paper, I hope the first one of a long sequence. 

Barry congratulations and best wishes for your new role</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Bill thank you very much for your invaluable work during the last year and congratulations for the recent peer reviewed paper, I hope the first one of a long sequence. </p>
<p>Barry congratulations and best wishes for your new role</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: LeeBowman</title>
		<link>http://www.uncommondescent.com/adminstrative/change-at-ud/comment-page-1/#comment-297637</link>
		<dc:creator>LeeBowman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 14 Nov 2008 22:06:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.uncommondescent.com/?p=3800#comment-297637</guid>
		<description>To add to the above, thanks Bill for your hard work and inspiration, and good luck in future endeavors.

Welcome Barry. Enjoy your past essays, and the comments they have engendered!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>To add to the above, thanks Bill for your hard work and inspiration, and good luck in future endeavors.</p>
<p>Welcome Barry. Enjoy your past essays, and the comments they have engendered!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: LeeBowman</title>
		<link>http://www.uncommondescent.com/adminstrative/change-at-ud/comment-page-1/#comment-297636</link>
		<dc:creator>LeeBowman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 14 Nov 2008 21:55:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.uncommondescent.com/?p=3800#comment-297636</guid>
		<description>Bill has probably done more to further the cause of ID in the science realm than anyone else.  From a public relations standpoint, and by that I mean academia enlightenment in particular, the focus on &lt;i&gt;design inferences&lt;/i&gt;, and the rationales for justification of those inferences as &#039;science&#039;, have been well delineated in his published works.  

One of my favorites, and one I have cited on occasion, is the keynote address delivered at the Research and Progress in Intelligent Design Conference at Biola University, 10/25/02.  

http://www.designinference.com/documents/2002.10.27.Disciplined_Science.htm

In it, he not only states well the case for ID as science, and its potential benefits, but summarizes well its inherent problems, and posits possible solutions.  Unfortunately, many of these problems are still with us, specifically, the need for &#039;on the bench&#039; and &#039;in the lab&#039; projects.  I see that as our next major hurdle, but feel it is achievable.  From the address, Bill said,

&lt;blockquote&gt;&quot;Intelligent design as a scientific and intellectual project has many sympathizers but few workers. The scholarly side of our movement at this time consists of a handful of academics and independent researchers. These numbers need to swell, and we need to be properly networked. We need to know who&#039;s out there working on what. 

To this end the Internet will prove invaluable. Intelligent design is at this time still an academic pariah. Consequently, it is difficult to concentrate our forces in any one institution. And yet, when I speak about intelligent design on university campuses, I almost invariably encounter at least one scientist on faculty eager to do research pertinent to intelligent design.&quot;&lt;/blockquote&gt;

On the surface, little seems to have changed.  We still see academia and the science foundations as vehemently opposed to ID, or to any rational challenges to evolutionary theory as currently stated, a variant form of cultural inertia.  But what we &lt;i&gt;don&#039;t&lt;/i&gt; see as clearly, is the upcoming crop of new scientists, who, given the enclave of logic and reason that ID has provided, and from enlightenment, not just via the classroom, but from the plethora of the more balanced and objective sources that the Internet provides, will not be as willing to accept the time worn and outdated paradigm that has stubbornly persisted.  As the old dogs retire, the new pups will have prominence.

If ID has stagnated to a degree, let&#039;s dust it off and renew it, perhaps referring to it as neoID.  I&#039;ll make a prediction.  We will soon see a new enlightenment period emerge, based not on &lt;i&gt;philosophical&lt;/i&gt; enlightenment, but on factual emergent data.  These revelations will add to our understanding of origins, and perhaps, provide a better understanding of our place in the cosmos.  

Darwin&#039;s 150 year anniversary is upon us, and I will make a second prediction.  It will be remembered, and rightly so, as commemorative of Charles Darwin, but allegorically, if Darwin&#039;s theory is viewed as a projectile, then 2009 will have been its apex.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Bill has probably done more to further the cause of ID in the science realm than anyone else.  From a public relations standpoint, and by that I mean academia enlightenment in particular, the focus on <i>design inferences</i>, and the rationales for justification of those inferences as &#8216;science&#8217;, have been well delineated in his published works.  </p>
<p>One of my favorites, and one I have cited on occasion, is the keynote address delivered at the Research and Progress in Intelligent Design Conference at Biola University, 10/25/02.  </p>
<p><a href="http://www.designinference.com/documents/2002.10.27.Disciplined_Science.htm" rel="nofollow">http://www.designinference.com.....cience.htm</a></p>
<p>In it, he not only states well the case for ID as science, and its potential benefits, but summarizes well its inherent problems, and posits possible solutions.  Unfortunately, many of these problems are still with us, specifically, the need for &#8216;on the bench&#8217; and &#8216;in the lab&#8217; projects.  I see that as our next major hurdle, but feel it is achievable.  From the address, Bill said,</p>
<blockquote><p>&#8220;Intelligent design as a scientific and intellectual project has many sympathizers but few workers. The scholarly side of our movement at this time consists of a handful of academics and independent researchers. These numbers need to swell, and we need to be properly networked. We need to know who&#8217;s out there working on what. </p>
<p>To this end the Internet will prove invaluable. Intelligent design is at this time still an academic pariah. Consequently, it is difficult to concentrate our forces in any one institution. And yet, when I speak about intelligent design on university campuses, I almost invariably encounter at least one scientist on faculty eager to do research pertinent to intelligent design.&#8221;</p></blockquote>
<p>On the surface, little seems to have changed.  We still see academia and the science foundations as vehemently opposed to ID, or to any rational challenges to evolutionary theory as currently stated, a variant form of cultural inertia.  But what we <i>don&#8217;t</i> see as clearly, is the upcoming crop of new scientists, who, given the enclave of logic and reason that ID has provided, and from enlightenment, not just via the classroom, but from the plethora of the more balanced and objective sources that the Internet provides, will not be as willing to accept the time worn and outdated paradigm that has stubbornly persisted.  As the old dogs retire, the new pups will have prominence.</p>
<p>If ID has stagnated to a degree, let&#8217;s dust it off and renew it, perhaps referring to it as neoID.  I&#8217;ll make a prediction.  We will soon see a new enlightenment period emerge, based not on <i>philosophical</i> enlightenment, but on factual emergent data.  These revelations will add to our understanding of origins, and perhaps, provide a better understanding of our place in the cosmos.  </p>
<p>Darwin&#8217;s 150 year anniversary is upon us, and I will make a second prediction.  It will be remembered, and rightly so, as commemorative of Charles Darwin, but allegorically, if Darwin&#8217;s theory is viewed as a projectile, then 2009 will have been its apex.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Borne</title>
		<link>http://www.uncommondescent.com/adminstrative/change-at-ud/comment-page-1/#comment-297632</link>
		<dc:creator>Borne</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 14 Nov 2008 20:42:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.uncommondescent.com/?p=3800#comment-297632</guid>
		<description>Ditto on all the above.  
UD is a great place to learn and share.  It&#039;s a vital source of clear thinking and info.

May it outlast and outshine PT, SW, PZ, RD and ... :-)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ditto on all the above.<br />
UD is a great place to learn and share.  It&#8217;s a vital source of clear thinking and info.</p>
<p>May it outlast and outshine PT, SW, PZ, RD and &#8230; <img src='http://www.uncommondescent.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':-)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: tragicmishap</title>
		<link>http://www.uncommondescent.com/adminstrative/change-at-ud/comment-page-1/#comment-297627</link>
		<dc:creator>tragicmishap</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 14 Nov 2008 19:20:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.uncommondescent.com/?p=3800#comment-297627</guid>
		<description>Also, I would like to say that what you are doing instead is far more important than herding cats like us.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Also, I would like to say that what you are doing instead is far more important than herding cats like us.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: tragicmishap</title>
		<link>http://www.uncommondescent.com/adminstrative/change-at-ud/comment-page-1/#comment-297626</link>
		<dc:creator>tragicmishap</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 14 Nov 2008 19:12:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.uncommondescent.com/?p=3800#comment-297626</guid>
		<description>Congrats Bill!  Cracking the peer review thing is absolutely huge.  Can&#039;t wait to see this paper :D.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Congrats Bill!  Cracking the peer review thing is absolutely huge.  Can&#8217;t wait to see this paper <img src='http://www.uncommondescent.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_biggrin.gif' alt=':D' class='wp-smiley' /> .</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Barb</title>
		<link>http://www.uncommondescent.com/adminstrative/change-at-ud/comment-page-1/#comment-297621</link>
		<dc:creator>Barb</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 14 Nov 2008 18:11:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.uncommondescent.com/?p=3800#comment-297621</guid>
		<description>Congratulations, Dr. Dembski!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Congratulations, Dr. Dembski!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

