Subscribe RSS
 
  • Home
  • News Desk
  • Other ID News
  • Resources
    • Frequently Raised, but Weak Arguments Against ID
    • ID Defined
    • Glossary
    • Video Archive
  • Archives
  • Comment Policy
    • Moderation
    • Put a Sock In It
  • About

Monthly Archives: October 2010

Death of a grande dame: can we build morality on the foundation of natural goodness?

October 31, 2010 Posted by vjtorley under Intelligent Design
20 Comments

Philippa Foot (1920-2010) was one of the greatest moral philosophers of the 20th century, but she insisted that she was “not clever at all” and “very uneducated.” She was greatly influenced by the philosopher Elizabeth Anscombe, whom she described in an interview as “more rigorously Catholic than the Pope,” but she herself was a card-carrying… more

Clarification of the limits to self organisation

October 31, 2010 Posted by Richard Johns under Intelligent Design
2 Comments

In the couple of weeks since I posted a summary of my work on self organisation, I’ve been hoping to receive criticism – none so far unfortunately.  However, by trawling the web I did find some anonymous comments.  While these were mostly of low quality, some recurrent objections have made me want to clarify a… more

Very Weak Anthropic Principle: Is the Principle going, going gone?

October 30, 2010 Posted by O'Leary under theistic evolution
2 Comments

Friends tell me that British theistic evolutionist Denis Alexander of the Faraday Institute spoke at Baylor University recently on the “Very Weak Anthropic Principle.” I’ve heard of the Anthropic Principle, which essentially means that the universe appears fine-tuned for intelligent life. I’ve also heard of the Weak Anthropic Principle, namely, The weak anthropic principle states… more

Vid: The prequel to the Big Bang?

October 30, 2010 Posted by O'Leary under Cosmology
18 Comments

A friend points to a popular overview of current ideas in theoretical physics on pre-Big Bang cosmology, check out “What Happened Before the Big Bang?” a recent episode of the BBC’s Horizon series. It’s on YouTube in six parts, featuring Michio Kaku, Neil Turok, Lee Smolin, Andre Linde, Roger Penrose, and Laura Mersini-Hougton. What do… more

Finding: Bees Solve The Traveling Salesman Problem

October 30, 2010 Posted by Cornelius Hunter under Intelligent Design
10 Comments

It is a classic problem in the field of computer science: In what order should a salesman visit his prospects? The traveling salesman problem may appear simple but it has engaged some of the greatest mathematical minds and today engages some of the fastest computers. This makes new findings, that bees routinely solve the problem… more

Christian Darwinism: Now you see the “Creator” and now you don’t, but believe anyway

October 30, 2010 Posted by O'Leary under Intelligent Design
No Comments

Well, believe something anyway, subject to rapid change. Once, years ago, I got a rather long phone call from a Christian evolutionist who wanted me to know that Darwin had added to the second edition of his Origin of Species the words “by the Creator” to imply that evolution was God-directed. That was supposed to… more

Theory of Everything: Putting failure to find such a theory to good use

October 29, 2010 Posted by O'Leary under Theory of Everything
4 Comments

Sure. Why waste a failure? In “The imperfect universe: Goodbye, theory of everything” (New Scientist, 10 May 2010, Magazine issue 2759), Marcelo Gleiser mourns, FIFTEEN years ago, I was a physicist hard at work hunting for a theory of nature that would unify the very big and the very small. There was good reason to… more

Which one is different: gravity, continental drift or evolution?

October 29, 2010 Posted by vjtorley under Intelligent Design
32 Comments

Newton’s theory of gravity, Wegener’s theory of continental drift and Darwin’s theory of evolution all have one thing in common: they have all been ridiculed as impossible at one time or another, because they lacked a plausible mechanism. So which theory is different from the rest? I shall argue that Darwin’s theory is unique, in… more

Extraterrestrials: They’re not there, but they must be !

October 29, 2010 Posted by O'Leary under Extraterrestrial life
10 Comments

Chris McKay, a planetary scientist at NASA Ames Research Center, reviews Paul Davies’s latest book, The Eerie Silence: Renewing Our Search for Alien Intelligence/Are We Alone In The Universe? , which argues that we should expand the hunt for intelligent life: McKay considers why we should look closer to home — perhaps even in our… more

No peace between “science” and “religion,” prof warns

October 27, 2010 Posted by O'Leary under Religion, Science
12 Comments

The United States put men on the moon, mapped the outer planets, and generally leads in science. And it is more religious than other countries. So, if religion makes a difference, bring it on. more

Prophet of Pointlessness sues Inventor of the Scarlet A

October 27, 2010 Posted by scordova under Culture
15 Comments

Richard Dawkins is known as the Prophet of Pointlessness because it was Dawkins who said: “[the universe] has precisely the properties we should expect if there is at bottom no design, no purpose, no evil, no good, nothing but pointless indifference.” Dawkins has something of a cult following and encourages his troops to wear a… more

Another Layer on the Information Story: Quorum Sensing

October 26, 2010 Posted by Jonathan M under Intelligent Design
6 Comments

I was recently directed to a video lecture on the phenomenon of quorum sensing, the mechanism by which bacteria communicate with one another to establish the population density of micro-organisms of their own kind within their proximal environment. Bonnie Bassler, the lecturer in this video, does a masterful job of portraying fairly technical concepts and… more

Bacterial ‘High-Flyer’ Takes Center Stage In The Biotechnology Arena

October 26, 2010 Posted by Robert Deyes under Intelligent Design
No Comments
Geese

The blogosphere is brimming with commentaries over the ever-visible changes that usher in the arrival of Autumn in the northern hemisphere (1). The beckoningly bright colors of the foliage on our trees and the seasonal appearance of pumpkins that adorn our porches and abound in the fields around our cities serve as reminders of a festive… more

Are machine-information metaphors bad for science?

October 25, 2010 Posted by David Tyler under Intelligent Design
74 Comments

According to Massimo Pigliucci and Maarten Boudry, the widespread use of machine-information metaphors is unfortunate and misleading. They complain about textbooks that develop metaphors to a considerable level of detail. As an example, they cite Alberts, who is often quoted for his analogy between a cell and a “miniature factory, complete with assembly lines, messengers,… more

It’s Amazing What Evolution Can Do!

October 25, 2010 Posted by PaV under Evolution, Intelligent Design
21 Comments

This article here recounts the now documented ability of bees to solve the “traveling salesman problem” faster than computers. And to imagine that evolution has done this! My, what a wonderful thing it is!—-(he says with sarcasm dripping). By just doing something over and over again, with little changes accumulating, a ‘computer,’ better than any… more

Michael Behe Goes Head-to-Head With Keith Fox

October 23, 2010 Posted by Jonathan M under Intelligent Design
22 Comments

A radio debate featuring Michael Behe and Keith Fox, discussing issues relating to the scientific substance, and theological implications, of ID was made available today on the Premier Christian Radio website. The audio can be found here. The introductory comments on the website read as follows: Michael Behe is professor of biochemistry at Lehigh University,… more

“Coming clean” about YEC?

October 22, 2010 Posted by William Dembski under Creationism, Intelligent Design, Religion, Science
45 Comments

Jack Krebs at Panda’s Thumb claims that I have “come clean” as a young earth creationist. There are a couple of problems with his announcement: (1) It’s not true, and (2) there’s nothing in my words that he quoted to justify his claim. Krebs seems to think that my recent statements clarifying my views represent… more

The 10^(-120) challenge, or: The fairies at the bottom of the garden

October 22, 2010 Posted by vjtorley under Intelligent Design
13 Comments

In an earlier post, I wrote that my faith in Intelligent Design was falsifiable, and I listed two criteria by which it might be falsified: 1. An empirical or mathematical demonstration that the probability of the emergence of life on Earth during the past four billion years as a result of purely natural processes, without… more

Autumn Reading for Jerry and friends

October 20, 2010 Posted by vjtorley under Intelligent Design
259 Comments

Japanese maple leaves. Over at Why Evolution is True, Professor Jerry Coyne has been busy at work. He has not only outlined a scenario that would convince him of God’s existence, but he has written an article entitled On P. Z. Myers on evidence for a god with a point-by-point rebuttal of P. Z. Myers’… more

Peer review: How much more believable than fortune telling these days?

October 20, 2010 Posted by O'Leary under Peer review
28 Comments

A number of red flags have shot up recently about comfy relationships between science, media, and corporate interests. Here’s a small batch to contemplate. more

Next Page »
Archives
  • February 2012
  • January 2012
  • December 2011
  • November 2011
  • October 2011
  • September 2011
  • August 2011
  • July 2011
  • June 2011
  • May 2011
  • April 2011
  • March 2011
  • February 2011
  • January 2011
  • December 2010
  • November 2010
  • October 2010
  • September 2010
  • August 2010
  • July 2010
  • June 2010
  • May 2010
  • April 2010
  • March 2010
  • February 2010
  • January 2010
  • December 2009
  • November 2009
  • October 2009
  • September 2009
  • August 2009
  • July 2009
  • June 2009
  • May 2009
  • April 2009
  • March 2009
  • February 2009
  • January 2009
  • December 2008
  • November 2008
  • October 2008
  • September 2008
  • August 2008
  • July 2008
  • June 2008
  • May 2008
  • April 2008
  • March 2008
  • February 2008
  • January 2008
  • December 2007
  • November 2007
  • October 2007
  • September 2007
  • August 2007
  • July 2007
  • June 2007
  • May 2007
  • April 2007
  • March 2007
  • February 2007
  • January 2007
  • December 2006
  • November 2006
  • October 2006
  • September 2006
  • August 2006
  • July 2006
  • June 2006
  • May 2006
  • April 2006
  • March 2006
  • February 2006
  • January 2006
  • December 2005
  • November 2005
  • October 2005
  • September 2005
  • August 2005
  • July 2005
  • June 2005
  • May 2005
  • April 2005
Recent Posts
  • Waiter! This primordial soup is cold!! Take it away!!
  • Plants’ common ancestor was complex, not simple life form, researchers say
  • Q: Is Logic simply a matter of axioms at play in an abstract logical world unconnected to external reality? A: Nope
  • Flying Squid
  • Peter Woit on the multiverse as a weapon against religion: “a lousy one and not going to convince anyone”
Popular Posts
  • A Scoville Scale for Dangerous Questions (18,551)
  • 10 + 1 Questions For Professor Myers (13,864)
  • Science and Freethinking (6,728)
  • ID Foundations, 14: “Islands” vs “Continents” of complex, specific function — a pivotal issue and debate (4,639)
  • At Some Point, the Obvious Becomes Transparently Obvious (or, Recognizing the Forrest, With all its Barbs, Through the Trees) (4,633)
Copyright (C) Uncommon Descent, Inc.