Archive for March, 2007
31 March 2007
Granville Sewell
In 1978-79 I was visiting professor in the computer science department at Purdue University, when the student newspaper (the Exponent) published a letter to the editor comparing “creationists” to “flat-earthers”. My reply, given below, was published a few days later. The reason I thought this 30-year-old letter might be of some interest to […]
Posted in Intelligent Design | 4 Comments »
31 March 2007
DaveScot
These are excerpts from the cover story of the March 26, 2007 issue of Chemical and Engineering Times dealing with the origin of life. Read the whole article at the link provided.
Revolutions In Chemistry
Priestley Medalist George M. Whitesides’ address
The Cell and the Nature of Life. I believe that understanding the cell is ultimately a […]
Posted in Intelligent Design | 14 Comments »
31 March 2007
DaveScot
Someone I correspond with sent me this. It’s a good example of how the design inference has been employed for practical matters.
On the subject of stacked stones in the wilderness, here is a little story that may be interesting. In my legal practice my most prominent pro bono case was to seek the […]
Posted in Intelligent Design | 14 Comments »
31 March 2007
DaveScot
My daughter who works at Dell sent me this. I thought it might be appreciated by all who’ve witnessed the deluge of Mac vs. PC television adverts.
Posted in Humor | 1 Comment »
31 March 2007
William Dembski
“Galileo’s conflict with the church could have probably been avoided if he had been endowed with less passion and more diplomacy; but long before that conflict, he had incurred the implacable hostility of the orthodox Aristotelians who held key positions at the Italian universities. Religion and political oppression play only an incidental part in the […]
Posted in Culture, Science, Religion | 4 Comments »
30 March 2007
GilDodgen
When considering design versus no design in both cosmology and biology, one thing seems strikingly obvious: The default position is backwards.
Concerning cosmology, the fine-tuning of the universe for life would appear to be prima facie evidence for design. One can either choose to believe (at least provisionally) that this is the case, based on some […]
Posted in Intelligent Design | 29 Comments »
30 March 2007
BarryA
This morning the New Scientist web site posted an article entitled “Is Dark Energy an Illusion?â€Â See here:
http://space.newscientist.com/article/dn11498-is-dark-energy-an-illusion.html
Here is the lead sentence:  “The quickening pace of our universe’s expansion may not be driven by a mysterious force called dark energy after all, but paradoxically, by the collapse of matter in small regions of space.â€Â
This article […]
Posted in Intelligent Design | 11 Comments »
30 March 2007
O'Leary
Here at Uncommon Descent, a longish combox discussion started recently - which spread here after I reposted some of my own comments at the Post-Darwinist - on whether the intelligent design guys would gain or lose credibility if they kicked out the young earth creationists (YECs, the folk who believe that the Bible teaches that […]
Posted in Intelligent Design | 47 Comments »
29 March 2007
LeeBowman
Richard Dawkins and Francis Collins are at it again, however not face to face this time, but as guests on alternate days on NPR’s ‘Fresh Air’ with Terry Gross. She asks pertinent questions but as always, remains objective, taking no position on either side. In Wednesday’s interview, Dawkins takes a moment reading from page 15 […]
Posted in Culture, Science, Philosophy, Evolution | 8 Comments »
29 March 2007
William Dembski
Here’s an article on evolving hardware developed by Norwegian scientists. Favorite quote: “Every creature in nature is a product of evolution, and did I mention that creationism is just bull? What the team has done is add evolution to hardware (Norwegian), all hardware that you and I have used so far is made the creationism […]
Posted in Comp. Sci. / Eng., Intelligent Design, Evolution | 18 Comments »
29 March 2007
scordova
[Event announcement]
One hundred years ago on March 9, Indiana passed the world’s first forced sterilization law. Two years later, Washington State enacted a similar measure. Both laws were part of a crusade to breed better humans known as “eugenics.” Promoted by evolutionary biologists in the name of Darwinian natural selection, eugenics led to the sterilization […]
Posted in Intelligent Design | 7 Comments »
29 March 2007
William Dembski
Here’s what’s appearing on Starbucks coffee cups that’s relevant to our concerns:
The Way I See It #224
Darwinism’s impact on traditional social values has not been as benign as its advocates would like us to believe. Despite the efforts of its modern defenders to distance themselves from its baleful social consequences, Darwinism’s connection with eugenics, […]
Posted in Culture, Intelligent Design | 5 Comments »
29 March 2007
DaveScot
Veering From Evolution
Fired teacher explains his presentation
By Christopher Stollar / The Bulletin
Published: March 25. 2007 5:00AM PST
On Wednesday, March 14, eight days into a new job teaching biology at Sisters High School, Kris Helphinstine showed a class of freshman and sophomore students pictures of naked corpses, a Nazi swastika and Charles Darwin in a PowerPoint […]
Posted in Intelligent Design | 50 Comments »
28 March 2007
William Dembski
Granville Sewell asked me to post this:
“The Evolution of the Long-Necked Giraffe”
A Preview of W.E.Loennig’s Part II
By Granville Sewell
Darwin’s story of how the giraffe got its long neck is perhaps the most popular and widely-told story of evolution. It is popular because it seems plausible: giraffes with slightly longer necks enjoyed a slight […]
Posted in Darwinism, Intelligent Design, Evolution | 17 Comments »
28 March 2007
scordova
Not long ago an anthropologist resigned in ‘dating disaster’. Now we learn world famous paleoantrhopologist Leakey Manipulated His Apelike “Skull 1470†to Look Human .
Dr. Leakey produced a reconstruction that could not have existed in real life….
let’s see if Leakey will recant. Let’s see if the textbook publishers will fix the mistake. […]
Posted in Intelligent Design | 12 Comments »
28 March 2007
scordova
Respected doctor and professor of neurosurgery Michael Egnor reports in Darwin, Mendel, Watson and Crick, and Al Gore:
Darwin’s theory impeded the recognition of Mendel’s discovery for a third of a century, and Darwin’s assertion that random variation was the raw material for biological complexity was of no help in decoding the genetic language of DNA. […]
Posted in Intelligent Design | 5 Comments »
28 March 2007
BarryA
The recent dustup surrounding the SMU design conference highlighted a rhetorical tactic that has become fashionable in the anti-ID herd. This tactic is to smear IDists with the “denier†tag, as if mere denial is self-evidently bad. Herewith, a reflection on famous deniers in history from another forum in which I participate (used with permission):
I […]
Posted in Intelligent Design | 16 Comments »
28 March 2007
William Dembski
Rarely does the public catch a glimpse of how Darwinists actually behave toward colleagues who disagree with their view of biological origins. Thus, as a public service, I’m presenting here a correspondence, initiated by Darwinists and unsolicited by our side, that provides readers of this blog with such a glimpse. Briefly, a Johns Hopkins biologist […]
Posted in Darwinism, Intelligent Design | 33 Comments »
28 March 2007
O'Leary
When people examine a new idea for the first time, they often approach it from a basis of older, assumed ideas which cause confusion. They can’t really evaluate the new idea properly until the source of confusion has been identified.
In discussing the intelligent design controversy with people, I sometimes hear the following comment:
If scientists conclude […]
Posted in Intelligent Design | 65 Comments »
27 March 2007
William Dembski
The following exchange is from the newsletter CCNet 66/2007 - 27 March 2007:
Christopher Morbey: Dear Professor Dyson: Thanks for taking time to answer questions! I’m wondering if you have an opinion regarding the new interest in “intelligent design” as an independent mode of explaining an event. Typically, pervading opinion demands that events occur only […]
Posted in Intelligent Design | 20 Comments »
26 March 2007
crandaddy
This has absolutely nothing to do with intelligent design, but I just had to share it. It’s the final 45.6 seconds of Saturday’s NCAA D-II men’s basketball national championship game between The Bulldogs of Barton College and the Warriors of Winona State University. Bear in mind as you watch this that Winona State […]
Posted in Off Topic, Intelligent Design | 4 Comments »
26 March 2007
William Dembski
For whatever reason, the people at richarddawkins.net put me on their mailing list and sent me an invitation some time back to write a birthday greeting for Richard Dawkins, who celebrates his 66th birthday today. Go to richarddawkins.net/happybirthdayRD, and you’ll find birthday greetings from Dan Dennett, Sam Harris, P.Z. Myers, Michael Shermer, etc. But my […]
Posted in Darwinism, Evolution | 13 Comments »
26 March 2007
DaveScot
A recent disagreement about the critical importance of gut flora to animal health led me to look for research into germ-free animals. GF animals have been available for research for about 50 years and initially they lived very short lives. The decrease in longevity was eventually traced to lack of critical enzymes in […]
Posted in Science, Intelligent Design, Biology, Evolution | 19 Comments »
25 March 2007
William Dembski
Two days ago I commented on a post at evolutionnews.org that seemed to catch Ken Miller red-handed in misrepresenting my work on specified complexity (go here for my post). Specifically, on a BBC program titled THE WAR ON SCIENCE, Miller is seen, right after I was shown speaking on probabilities, commenting on the use of […]
Posted in Darwinism, Intelligent Design, Evolution | 26 Comments »
24 March 2007
O'Leary
Apparently, one of the Thumbsmen has claimed that Bill Dembski overstated/misstated (or whatever) Darwin’s contempt for the feckless* Irish, with their endless stream of brats (combined, of course, with his approval of the thrifty and allegedly cautiously procreative Scot).
Which is hilarious, because contempt for the Irish was part and parcel of Darwin’s Brit toffery - a social […]
Posted in Intelligent Design | 32 Comments »
24 March 2007
William Dembski
SMU appears upset about the Darwin vs. Design conference taking place in April and reported here yesterday (go here). The article below in today’s Dallas Morning News says that the anthropology department at SMU wrote to the administration: “These are conferences of and for believers and their sympathetic recruits…” Doesn’t the “M” in SMU refer […]
Posted in Darwinism, Intelligent Design, Evolution | 7 Comments »
24 March 2007
William Dembski
At the Panda’s Thumb (go here), PvM suggests that I quoted Darwin’s remarks about the Irish out of context in a recent blog entry (go here for the quote). Darwin, quoting a certain Mr. Greg with approval, refers to “the careless, squalid, unaspiring Irishman.” Mr. Greg goes on to say that the Irish multiply like […]
Posted in Darwinism | 20 Comments »
23 March 2007
LeeBowman
A special debate between Alister McGrath, Professor of Historical Theology at Oxford University, author of “Dawkins’ God” and “The Dawkins Delusion” and Peter Atkins, Professor of Chemistry at Oxford University, well-known atheist and supporter of Richard Dawkins. As seen on Channel 4’s “The trouble with atheism”.
This event was organised jointly by The University of Edinburgh […]
Posted in Humor, Intelligent Design, Evolution | 8 Comments »
23 March 2007
GilDodgen
A bunch of people are mad at me for my “wasted life” comment, and I confess to an injudicious choice of words. Of course I don’t believe that Ken Miller’s, or anyone else’s life is a total waste just because one’s professional career might be invested in something that turns out to be wrong. But […]
Posted in Darwinism, Intelligent Design | 13 Comments »
23 March 2007
William Dembski
In response to the upcoming Darwin vs. Design seminar at Southern Methodist University April 13th and 14th (featuring Lee Strobel, Steve Meyer, Mike Behe, and Jay Richards — go here), the university is set to issue the following statement in response:
Under SMU’s procedures for making appropriate campus facilities available for community events, McFarlin Auditorium has […]
Posted in Darwinism, Intelligent Design, Evolution, Education | 6 Comments »
23 March 2007
William Dembski
Below is a recent post from evolutionnews.org describing Ken Miller’s criticism of my approach to detecting design as he gave it on a recent BBC program. I was interviewed for the program, but had no idea that Richard Dawkins would be narrating it or that Ken Miller would be given the final word in assessing […]
Posted in Intelligent Design | 29 Comments »