Uncommon Descent

Archive for March, 2007

31 March 2007

Is ID science?–a 30-year old opinion

Granville Sewell

In 1978-79 I was visiting professor in the computer science department at Purdue University, when the student newspaper (the Exponent) published a letter to the editor comparing “creationists” to “flat-earthers”. My reply, given below, was published a few days later. The reason I thought this 30-year-old letter might be of some interest to […]

31 March 2007

Priestley Medalist George Whitesides on Origin of Life

DaveScot

These are excerpts from the cover story of the March 26, 2007 issue of Chemical and Engineering Times dealing with the origin of life. Read the whole article at the link provided.

Revolutions In Chemistry
Priestley Medalist George M. Whitesides’ address

The Cell and the Nature of Life. I believe that understanding the cell is ultimately a […]

31 March 2007

A Mere Stack of Stones

DaveScot

Someone I correspond with sent me this. It’s a good example of how the design inference has been employed for practical matters.
On the subject of stacked stones in the wilderness, here is a little story that may be interesting. In my legal practice my most prominent pro bono case was to seek the […]

31 March 2007

Off Topic: Personal Computer Humor

DaveScot

My daughter who works at Dell sent me this. I thought it might be appreciated by all who’ve witnessed the deluge of Mac vs. PC television adverts.

31 March 2007

Quote of the day: Arthur Koestler on “Corporate Orthodoxy”

William Dembski

“Galileo’s conflict with the church could have probably been avoided if he had been endowed with less passion and more diplomacy; but long before that conflict, he had incurred the implacable hostility of the orthodox Aristotelians who held key positions at the Italian universities. Religion and political oppression play only an incidental part in the […]

30 March 2007

Friday Musings: The Credible Versus The Incredible

GilDodgen

When considering design versus no design in both cosmology and biology, one thing seems strikingly obvious: The default position is backwards.
Concerning cosmology, the fine-tuning of the universe for life would appear to be prima facie evidence for design. One can either choose to believe (at least provisionally) that this is the case, based on some […]

30 March 2007

The Illusion of Knowledge Revisited

BarryA

This morning the New Scientist web site posted an article entitled “Is Dark Energy an Illusion?”  See here:
http://space.newscientist.com/article/dn11498-is-dark-energy-an-illusion.html
Here is the lead sentence:  “The quickening pace of our universe’s expansion may not be driven by a mysterious force called dark energy after all, but paradoxically, by the collapse of matter in small regions of space.”
This article […]

30 March 2007

Who doubts common descent? You’d be surprised

O'Leary

Here at Uncommon Descent, a longish combox discussion started recently - which spread here after I reposted some of my own comments at the Post-Darwinist - on whether the intelligent design guys would gain or lose credibility if they kicked out the young earth creationists (YECs, the folk who believe that the Bible teaches that […]

29 March 2007

Terry Gross interviews Richard Dawkins and Francis Collins

LeeBowman

Richard Dawkins and Francis Collins are at it again, however not face to face this time, but as guests on alternate days on NPR’s ‘Fresh Air’ with Terry Gross. She asks pertinent questions but as always, remains objective, taking no position on either side. In Wednesday’s interview, Dawkins takes a moment reading from page 15 […]

29 March 2007

Evolving Hardware

William Dembski

Here’s an article on evolving hardware developed by Norwegian scientists. Favorite quote: “Every creature in nature is a product of evolution, and did I mention that creationism is just bull? What the team has done is add evolution to hardware (Norwegian), all hardware that you and I have used so far is made the creationism […]

29 March 2007

Darwin’s Dangerous Idea: The Disturbing Legacy of America’s Eugenics Crusade

scordova

[Event announcement]
One hundred years ago on March 9, Indiana passed the world’s first forced sterilization law. Two years later, Washington State enacted a similar measure. Both laws were part of a crusade to breed better humans known as “eugenics.” Promoted by evolutionary biologists in the name of Darwinian natural selection, eugenics led to the sterilization […]

29 March 2007

The Wisdom of Starbucks — Allowing All Sides a Place at the Table

William Dembski

Here’s what’s appearing on Starbucks coffee cups that’s relevant to our concerns:
The Way I See It #224
Darwinism’s impact on traditional social values has not been as benign as its advocates would like us to believe. Despite the efforts of its modern defenders to distance themselves from its baleful social consequences, Darwinism’s connection with eugenics, […]

29 March 2007

High School Biology Teacher Fired

DaveScot

Veering From Evolution

Fired teacher explains his presentation
By Christopher Stollar / The Bulletin
Published: March 25. 2007 5:00AM PST
On Wednesday, March 14, eight days into a new job teaching biology at Sisters High School, Kris Helphinstine showed a class of freshman and sophomore students pictures of naked corpses, a Nazi swastika and Charles Darwin in a PowerPoint […]

28 March 2007

The Evolution of the Long-Necked Giraffe — A Preview

William Dembski

Granville Sewell asked me to post this:
“The Evolution of the Long-Necked Giraffe”
A Preview of W.E.Loennig’s Part II
By Granville Sewell
Darwin’s story of how the giraffe got its long neck is perhaps the most popular and widely-told story of evolution. It is popular because it seems plausible: giraffes with slightly longer necks enjoyed a slight […]

28 March 2007

More reasons paleoanthropology has a bad reputation and ID continues its advance

scordova

Not long ago an anthropologist resigned in ‘dating disaster’. Now we learn world famous paleoantrhopologist Leakey Manipulated His Apelike “Skull 1470” to Look Human .

Dr. Leakey produced a reconstruction that could not have existed in real life….
let’s see if Leakey will recant. Let’s see if the textbook publishers will fix the mistake. […]

28 March 2007

“Eugenics was Darwin’s only gift to medicine”

scordova

Respected doctor and professor of neurosurgery Michael Egnor reports in Darwin, Mendel, Watson and Crick, and Al Gore:

Darwin’s theory impeded the recognition of Mendel’s discovery for a third of a century, and Darwin’s assertion that random variation was the raw material for biological complexity was of no help in decoding the genetic language of DNA. […]

28 March 2007

Deniers Bad; Herd Followers Good???

BarryA

The recent dustup surrounding the SMU design conference highlighted a rhetorical tactic that has become fashionable in the anti-ID herd.  This tactic is to smear IDists with the “denier” tag, as if mere denial is self-evidently bad.  Herewith, a reflection on famous deniers in history from another forum in which I participate (used with permission):
I […]

28 March 2007

If you could be a fly on the wall — now you can!

William Dembski

Rarely does the public catch a glimpse of how Darwinists actually behave toward colleagues who disagree with their view of biological origins. Thus, as a public service, I’m presenting here a correspondence, initiated by Darwinists and unsolicited by our side, that provides readers of this blog with such a glimpse. Briefly, a Johns Hopkins biologist […]

28 March 2007

The arsonist’s tale: Misconceptions about intelligent design

O'Leary

When people examine a new idea for the first time, they often approach it from a basis of older, assumed ideas which cause confusion. They can’t really evaluate the new idea properly until the source of confusion has been identified.
In discussing the intelligent design controversy with people, I sometimes hear the following comment:
If scientists conclude […]

27 March 2007

Freeman Dyson comments on ID

William Dembski

The following exchange is from the newsletter CCNet 66/2007 - 27 March 2007:
Christopher Morbey: Dear Professor Dyson: Thanks for taking time to answer questions! I’m wondering if you have an opinion regarding the new interest in “intelligent design” as an independent mode of explaining an event. Typically, pervading opinion demands that events occur only […]

26 March 2007

Off-Topic: Ahhh, The Madness of March!

crandaddy

This has absolutely nothing to do with intelligent design, but I just had to share it. It’s the final 45.6 seconds of Saturday’s NCAA D-II men’s basketball national championship game between The Bulldogs of Barton College and the Warriors of Winona State University. Bear in mind as you watch this that Winona State […]

26 March 2007

Dawkins’s 66th birthday — Hey, what about my birthday greeting?

William Dembski

For whatever reason, the people at richarddawkins.net put me on their mailing list and sent me an invitation some time back to write a birthday greeting for Richard Dawkins, who celebrates his 66th birthday today. Go to richarddawkins.net/happybirthdayRD, and you’ll find birthday greetings from Dan Dennett, Sam Harris, P.Z. Myers, Michael Shermer, etc. But my […]

26 March 2007

Germ Free Animal Lifespan Evidence of Design?

DaveScot

A recent disagreement about the critical importance of gut flora to animal health led me to look for research into germ-free animals. GF animals have been available for research for about 50 years and initially they lived very short lives. The decrease in longevity was eventually traced to lack of critical enzymes in […]

25 March 2007

Ken Miller: “Blame the BBC’s bad editing”

William Dembski

Two days ago I commented on a post at evolutionnews.org that seemed to catch Ken Miller red-handed in misrepresenting my work on specified complexity (go here for my post). Specifically, on a BBC program titled THE WAR ON SCIENCE, Miller is seen, right after I was shown speaking on probabilities, commenting on the use of […]

24 March 2007

Darwin and the Irish … again

O'Leary

Apparently, one of the Thumbsmen has claimed that Bill Dembski overstated/misstated (or whatever) Darwin’s contempt for the feckless* Irish, with their endless stream of brats (combined, of course, with his approval of the thrifty and allegedly cautiously procreative Scot).
Which is hilarious, because contempt for the Irish was part and parcel of Darwin’s Brit toffery - a social […]

24 March 2007

SMU in a tizzy over ID

William Dembski

SMU appears upset about the Darwin vs. Design conference taking place in April and reported here yesterday (go here). The article below in today’s Dallas Morning News says that the anthropology department at SMU wrote to the administration: “These are conferences of and for believers and their sympathetic recruits…” Doesn’t the “M” in SMU refer […]

24 March 2007

Proving my point at the Panda’s Thumb

William Dembski

At the Panda’s Thumb (go here), PvM suggests that I quoted Darwin’s remarks about the Irish out of context in a recent blog entry (go here for the quote). Darwin, quoting a certain Mr. Greg with approval, refers to “the careless, squalid, unaspiring Irishman.” Mr. Greg goes on to say that the Irish multiply like […]

23 March 2007

Debate between Alister McGrath and Peter Atkins

LeeBowman

A special debate between Alister McGrath, Professor of Historical Theology at Oxford University, author of “Dawkins’ God” and “The Dawkins Delusion” and Peter Atkins, Professor of Chemistry at Oxford University, well-known atheist and supporter of Richard Dawkins. As seen on Channel 4’s “The trouble with atheism”.
This event was organised jointly by The University of Edinburgh […]

23 March 2007

Professional Life Investments and Objectivity in Evaluating ID’s Logic and Evidence

GilDodgen

A bunch of people are mad at me for my “wasted life” comment, and I confess to an injudicious choice of words. Of course I don’t believe that Ken Miller’s, or anyone else’s life is a total waste just because one’s professional career might be invested in something that turns out to be wrong. But […]

23 March 2007

SMU: “Did I say leprosy? I meant intelligent design!”

William Dembski

In response to the upcoming Darwin vs. Design seminar at Southern Methodist University April 13th and 14th (featuring Lee Strobel, Steve Meyer, Mike Behe, and Jay Richards — go here), the university is set to issue the following statement in response:
Under SMU’s procedures for making appropriate campus facilities available for community events, McFarlin Auditorium has […]

23 March 2007

The Collapse of Ken Miller

William Dembski

Below is a recent post from evolutionnews.org describing Ken Miller’s criticism of my approach to detecting design as he gave it on a recent BBC program. I was interviewed for the program, but had no idea that Richard Dawkins would be narrating it or that Ken Miller would be given the final word in assessing […]