July – 2005 – Serving The Intelligent Design Community
Subscribe RSS
 
benefits of prozac and how to buy prozac you can use a credit card prozac’s advantages and how to order buy prozac online and read here buy lexapro online without a prescription is no longer a problem buy lasix buy citalopram Lexapro answer your qestions
  • Home
  • News Desk
  • Other ID News
  • Resources
    • Frequently Raised, but Weak Arguments Against ID
    • ID Defined
    • Glossary
    • Video Archive
  • Archives
  • Comment Policy
    • Moderation
    • Put a Sock In It
  • About

Monthly Archives: July 2005

You naive, stupid Americans! — With love and best wishes, Eugenie Scott

July 14, 2005 Posted by William Dembski under Intelligent Design
7 Comments

On May 21st, I wrote an item on this blog titled “Sorry, kids, but you’re just too stupid” (go here), which described one rationale by Darwinists to exclude the teaching of intelligent design in the public schools, namely, kids are too stupid to understand the issues raised by evolutionary theory so that bringing up intelligent… more

ID and Neuroscience

July 14, 2005 Posted by William Dembski under Intelligent Design, Science
20 Comments

My good friend and colleague Jeffrey Schwartz (along with Mario Beauregard and Henry Stapp) has just published a paper in the Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society that challenges the materialism endemic to so much of contemporary neuroscience. By contrast, it argues for the irreducibility of mind (and therefore intelligence) to material mechanisms. more

“Debunking Darwin”

July 13, 2005 Posted by William Dembski under Darwinism, Education, Intelligent Design
3 Comments

My alumni/ae magazine, The University of Chicago Magazine, has a brief piece on me in its June 2005 issue (p. 58). It’s always interesting to see how one is perceived: more

Hard left atheist/agnostic espousing ID

July 12, 2005 Posted by William Dembski under Intelligent Design
13 Comments

Although it may be morally offensive to consider that we may be some ET High School science project gone awry, it would explain a lot. . . . So count us among those who hold that the idea of “intelligent design” should be included in the scholastic curriculum — but without any prejudicial mention of… more

Discovery Institute Takes up the Case of Bryan Leonard

July 11, 2005 Posted by William Dembski under Darwinism, Education, Evolution, Intelligent Design
3 Comments

Discovery Institute Files Public Records Request in OSU Evolution Academic Freedom Case SEATTLE – Discovery Institute has filed a public records request with the Ohio State University (OSU) seeking all documents related to Darwinist attacks on OSU doctoral candidate Bryan Leonard. The request was submitted under the Ohio Public Records Act. more

New Scientist Issue on ID

July 10, 2005 Posted by William Dembski under Darwinism, Evolution, Intelligent Design
11 Comments

media coverage of intelligent design has mostly failed to present your case on scientific grounds more

Follow-Up on Cardinal Schönborn’s NYTimes OpEd

July 9, 2005 Posted by William Dembski under Evolution, Intelligent Design
10 Comments

Leading Cardinal Redefines Church’s View on Evolution By CORNELIA DEAN and LAURIE GOODSTEIN more

The Smithsonian’s ID Troubles

July 8, 2005 Posted by William Dembski under Intelligent Design
10 Comments

Check out the following article in The Scientist: more

Jeffrey Shallit, Part II

July 8, 2005 Posted by William Dembski under Intelligent Design
6 Comments

In replying to my blog entry of June 23, 2005 (go here for my entry and here for Shallit’s response), Jeffrey Shallit has succumbed to the endearing weakness of revising history in his own favor. I’ll respond to him point for point: more

Signs of the Catholic Church Coming Out Against Neo-Darwinism and for ID

July 7, 2005 Posted by William Dembski under Evolution, Intelligent Design
3 Comments

Cardinal Schönborn’s oped today in the NYTimes is one of the first signs that the Catholic Church under Pope Benedict XVI is going to be repudiating neo-Darwinism and supporting ID. Schönborn is both a close personal friend of the pope and philosophically on the same page with him. See also Mike Behe’s comments about this… more

Conservatives on Evolution and ID

July 7, 2005 Posted by William Dembski under Evolution, Intelligent Design
6 Comments

The New Republic asked the opinions of prominent conservatives on evolution and ID. more

Speed of Mutations and Not Natural Selection the Key

July 6, 2005 Posted by William Dembski under Darwinism, Evolution
4 Comments

For more than three decades, molecular evolutionists have thought that no matter how many genetic mutations show up on a specific gene, whether or not those mutations become fixed in the species is determined primarily by natural selection. The new study shows that the speed at which these new mutations arrive also affects whether the… more

CHRISTIANITY TODAY on Privileged Planet Controversy

July 6, 2005 Posted by William Dembski under Intelligent Design
2 Comments

Jewish mathematician David Berlinski, a well-known critic of Darwinism, told Christianity Today, “I thought the uproar was indecent. I am in general appalled but not surprised by the willingness of academics to give up every principle of free speech and honest debate whenever they think they can do so without paying a price.” MORE more

Doing the Piledriver on Saint Charles

July 5, 2005 Posted by William Dembski under Darwinism, Evolution
2 Comments

Of all the professional wrestling moves, the piledriver most profoundly signifies how I conceive of the relation between ID and Darwin’s legacy. Think of the following image, therefore, as a metaphor of the ID movement: more

Some URLs of Interest

July 5, 2005 Posted by William Dembski under Religion, Science
3 Comments

Tom Schneider, “Mr. Biological Information” himself and one of my critics, seems genuinely concerned about the welfare of my soul, though in his case he wants to help me find my way out of my religious faith. Here are two articles that he recently recommended to me: more

Can Skeptics Ever Change Their Minds?

July 5, 2005 Posted by William Dembski under Evolution, Intelligent Design
4 Comments

Massimo Pigliucci, in the past one of my more extreme critics (e.g., go here and here), is now trying to put a softer face on his skepticism and atheism. He admits that on three matters relevant to the ID debate, he has changed his mind. I’ll leave it to you to decide if these changes… more

Quantum Physics Supports Evolution and Refutes ID

July 5, 2005 Posted by William Dembski under Evolution, Intelligent Design
3 Comments

It must be true — I read it in the New York Times: http://www.nytimes.com/2005/07/05/science/05essa.html? more

Shermer on ID in Scientific American — As Good As It Gets?

July 5, 2005 Posted by William Dembski under Darwinism, Evolution, Intelligent Design
5 Comments

Earlier on this blog, DaveScot cited Michael Shermer’s account of the Word Summit on Evolution that took place in the Galapagos Islands last month (go here for Shermer’s account in the Scientific American). TomG then raised the following question (for the thread in which he did so, go here): more

Real Skepticism vs. Sham Skepticism

July 4, 2005 Posted by William Dembski under Intelligent Design
5 Comments

I appreciate emails like this by ID skeptics who are genuine in their skepticism and see through the sham skepticism of persons who may appropriately be described as secular fundamentalists: more

The ID Answer Man?

July 4, 2005 Posted by William Dembski under Education
15 Comments

[Sorry my original posting here was a bit gruff. Let me rephrase it as follows:] I’m happy to respond to questions that are raised in the comments on this blog provided they are pertinent to the thread in which they appear and provided I have the time. On the other hand, questions out of the… more

« Previous Page — Next Page »
Archives
  • May 2013
  • April 2013
  • March 2013
  • February 2013
  • January 2013
  • December 2012
  • November 2012
  • October 2012
  • September 2012
  • August 2012
  • July 2012
  • June 2012
  • May 2012
  • April 2012
  • March 2012
  • February 2012
  • January 2012
  • December 2011
  • November 2011
  • October 2011
  • September 2011
  • August 2011
  • July 2011
  • June 2011
  • May 2011
  • April 2011
  • March 2011
  • February 2011
  • January 2011
  • December 2010
  • November 2010
  • October 2010
  • September 2010
  • August 2010
  • July 2010
  • June 2010
  • May 2010
  • April 2010
  • March 2010
  • February 2010
  • January 2010
  • December 2009
  • November 2009
  • October 2009
  • September 2009
  • August 2009
  • July 2009
  • June 2009
  • May 2009
  • April 2009
  • March 2009
  • February 2009
  • January 2009
  • December 2008
  • November 2008
  • October 2008
  • September 2008
  • August 2008
  • July 2008
  • June 2008
  • May 2008
  • April 2008
  • March 2008
  • February 2008
  • January 2008
  • December 2007
  • November 2007
  • October 2007
  • September 2007
  • August 2007
  • July 2007
  • June 2007
  • May 2007
  • April 2007
  • March 2007
  • February 2007
  • January 2007
  • December 2006
  • November 2006
  • October 2006
  • September 2006
  • August 2006
  • July 2006
  • June 2006
  • May 2006
  • April 2006
  • March 2006
  • February 2006
  • January 2006
  • December 2005
  • November 2005
  • October 2005
  • September 2005
  • August 2005
  • July 2005
  • June 2005
  • May 2005
  • April 2005
Recent Posts
  • Are vertebrates really smarter than invertebrates?
  • Academics: Don’t you dare let the public know what we are talking about!
  • Darwin-doubting mathematician David Berlinski on why math IS really important
  • An insurrection against “journal impact factors” in science?
  • A corrective to some remarks regarding first principles of reason, showing that such first principles are just that . . .
Sponsored Links
Popular Posts
  • 10 + 1 Questions For Professor Myers (14,978)
  • A Whale of a Problem for Evolution: Ancient Whale Jawbone Found in Antartica (13,346)
  • UB Sets It Out Step-By-Step (12,477)
  • A world-famous chemist tells the truth: there’s no scientist alive today who understands macroevolution (8,798)
  • Richard Dawkins On His Recent Encounter With John Lennox (Updated) (7,405)
©Uncommon Descent, Inc., Barry K. Arrington, President
Powered by WordPress and The Clear Line Theme