June – 2005 – Serving The Intelligent Design Community
Subscribe RSS
 
benefits of prozac and how to buy prozac you can use a credit card prozac’s advantages and how to order buy prozac online and read here buy lexapro online without a prescription is no longer a problem buy lasix buy citalopram Lexapro answer your qestions
  • Home
  • News Desk
  • Other ID News
  • Resources
    • Frequently Raised, but Weak Arguments Against ID
    • ID Defined
    • Glossary
    • Video Archive
  • Archives
  • Comment Policy
    • Moderation
    • Put a Sock In It
  • About

Monthly Archives: June 2005

“In Defense of Intelligent Design”

June 30, 2005 Posted by William Dembski under Evolution, Intelligent Design
32 Comments

Philip Clayton, a professor at the Claremont School of Theology, asked me to contribute an article to The Oxford Handbook of Religion and Science that he is editing. He asked me specifically to write on the topic “In Defense of Intelligent Design” for the section titled “Central Theoretical Debates in Religion and Science: Intelligent Design… more

TRIZ and ID

June 29, 2005 Posted by William Dembski under Intelligent Design
8 Comments

TRIZ (a Russian acronym that is usually translated “theory of inventive problem solving” and is pronounced treez) was developed by Russian scientists and engineers trying to understand technological evolution. I’ve touched on TRIZ’s relevance to ID in a number of my writings (go here, for instance). Some useful sites for understanding TRIZ are the following: more

Mammoth Design — Where Is My Dozer?

June 28, 2005 Posted by William Dembski under Intelligent Design
4 Comments

Check out the following pps file here (keep clicking to view slide show). Thanks Dennis White! more

“Intelligent Evolution” — If the courts rule against ID …

June 28, 2005 Posted by William Dembski under Darwinism, Evolution, Intelligent Design
24 Comments

There are now a number of initiatives nationally in which evolution is being challenged and ID promoted. What would happen if the courts rule against ID, declaring it religion? In the long term, this prospect is of little consequence because the momentum is now with ID and the inertia with evolution. more

Badger-Baiting and the Demise of Evolutionary Theory

June 27, 2005 Posted by William Dembski under Evolution, Intelligent Design
3 Comments

scientists of the highest caliber in the highest echelon starting to take seriously the possibility that evolution (i.e., chemical evolution/origin of life as well as macroevolution) are bankrupt and ID will soon be mainstreamed more

Timetable for the mainstreaming of ID

June 26, 2005 Posted by William Dembski under Evolution, Intelligent Design
17 Comments

ID, which thrives as the subversive instrument par excellence for exposing priestcraft dressed in a scientific lab coat more

Nobel Laureates for ID

June 24, 2005 Posted by William Dembski under Intelligent Design
10 Comments

Check out the following webpage: http://www.weloennig.de/Nobelpreistraeger1a.html. more

Recent Media Appearances by ID Leaders (Streaming Video)

June 23, 2005 Posted by William Dembski under Evolution, Intelligent Design
3 Comments

Go here. more

2006 Point Counterpoint Forum

June 23, 2005 Posted by William Dembski under Intelligent Design
13 Comments

The 2006 Point Counterpoint Forum is scheduled for February 10-11, 2006, on “Debating Design” – whether the universe was created by intelligent design or by evolution. The dialogue will be between one of intelligent design’s leading thinkers, William Dembski, the newly named director of the Center for Science and Theology at the Southern Baptist Theological… more

New Article on Specification

June 23, 2005 Posted by William Dembski under Intelligent Design
9 Comments

Specification: The Pattern That Signifies Intelligence By William A. Dembski more

Jeffrey Shallit

June 23, 2005 Posted by William Dembski under Evolution, Intelligent Design, Science
11 Comments

The irony is that Shallit and Elsberry are making a name for themselves by parasitizing my work. more

Dynamic genomes, morphological stasis and the origin of irreducible complexity

June 22, 2005 Posted by William Dembski under Intelligent Design
7 Comments

Dynamic genomes, morphological stasis and the origin of irreducible complexity Wolf-Ekkehard Lönnig Max-Planck-Institut for Plant Breeding Research, Carl-von-Linné-weg 10 50829 Cologne, Germany more

Charlie Townes on ID

June 21, 2005 Posted by William Dembski under Evolution, Intelligent Design, Religion, Science
15 Comments

Charlie Townes, Nobel laureate and the most recent winner of the Templeton Prize, has an interesting interview in which he leaves some room for ID (go here). more

“By Design or by Chance?” wins two top honours

June 20, 2005 Posted by William Dembski under Intelligent Design, Science
1 Comment

“By Design or by Chance?” wins two top honours June 20, 2005, Toronto At the Write! Canada convention awards night (June 17, 2004), By Design or by Chance?, an overview of the intelligent design controversy, won two Canadian Christian Writing Awards, one in the category of books on culture and the other in the category… more

Mushroom Physiologist Attacks ID

June 20, 2005 Posted by William Dembski under Evolution, Intelligent Design
6 Comments

Gary Novak (mushroom physiologist) says he has evolved yeast into morel mushrooms in the lab, mocks ID, and joins the fray (go here). What Novak has actually shown, so one of my close ID biologist colleagues informs me, is that when he tries to grow wild morel mushrooms on artificial nutrient media in laboratory Petri… more

Eugenie Scott’s Just Deserts

June 20, 2005 Posted by William Dembski under Evolution, Intelligent Design, Science
11 Comments

CALIFORNIA ACADEMY OF SCIENCES SETTLES LIBEL CLAIM OVER EVOLUTION ARTICLE Parent’s Claim Sparked by False Article by Leading Darwin Advocate ROSEVILLE, CA — The California Academy of Sciences has settled with a California parent, Larry Caldwell, who raised a potential libel claim against the organization over its publication of a false and defamatory article authored… more

Evolution Guarantees the Success of the ID Meme!!

June 19, 2005 Posted by William Dembski under Evolution, Intelligent Design
5 Comments

Maybe, just maybe, ID is a meme that is far better adapted than evolution for the irrational, haphazardly evolved non-specified complex environment that constitutes the human mind. more

York Daily Record Reports on Dover

June 19, 2005 Posted by William Dembski under Education, Intelligent Design
3 Comments

Laurie Lebo of the York Daily Record interviewed me about being dropped as an expert witness in the Dover ID case (go here for the story). The Thomas More Law Center, a public interest law firm which had hired me as an expert witness, did not want the Foundation for Thought and Ethics, which publishes… more

“Transitional Vertebrate Fossils”

June 19, 2005 Posted by William Dembski under Darwinism, Evolution
3 Comments

Kathleen Hunt’s Talk.Origins FAQ on transitional vertebrate fossils has been available for years. The URL for that FAQ is http://www.talkorigins.org/faqs/faq-transitional.html. You might enjoy comparing it with Richard Milton’s response at http://www.alternativescience.com/talk-origins-transitions.htm. more

Steinfels on Ruse in the NYTimes

June 19, 2005 Posted by William Dembski under Evolution, Intelligent Design, Religion, Science
1 Comment

Professor Ruse’s new book suggests that the religious resistance to evolutionary theory is a lot more understandable and a lot less unreasonable than its opponents recognize. more

Next Page »
Archives
  • May 2013
  • April 2013
  • March 2013
  • February 2013
  • January 2013
  • December 2012
  • November 2012
  • October 2012
  • September 2012
  • August 2012
  • July 2012
  • June 2012
  • May 2012
  • April 2012
  • March 2012
  • February 2012
  • January 2012
  • December 2011
  • November 2011
  • October 2011
  • September 2011
  • August 2011
  • July 2011
  • June 2011
  • May 2011
  • April 2011
  • March 2011
  • February 2011
  • January 2011
  • December 2010
  • November 2010
  • October 2010
  • September 2010
  • August 2010
  • July 2010
  • June 2010
  • May 2010
  • April 2010
  • March 2010
  • February 2010
  • January 2010
  • December 2009
  • November 2009
  • October 2009
  • September 2009
  • August 2009
  • July 2009
  • June 2009
  • May 2009
  • April 2009
  • March 2009
  • February 2009
  • January 2009
  • December 2008
  • November 2008
  • October 2008
  • September 2008
  • August 2008
  • July 2008
  • June 2008
  • May 2008
  • April 2008
  • March 2008
  • February 2008
  • January 2008
  • December 2007
  • November 2007
  • October 2007
  • September 2007
  • August 2007
  • July 2007
  • June 2007
  • May 2007
  • April 2007
  • March 2007
  • February 2007
  • January 2007
  • December 2006
  • November 2006
  • October 2006
  • September 2006
  • August 2006
  • July 2006
  • June 2006
  • May 2006
  • April 2006
  • March 2006
  • February 2006
  • January 2006
  • December 2005
  • November 2005
  • October 2005
  • September 2005
  • August 2005
  • July 2005
  • June 2005
  • May 2005
  • April 2005
Recent Posts
  • Yet another life form survives long after it should have been extinct
  • Reflections from the Whiting School Class of 2013
  • Naturalism, Intelligent Design and Extraordinary Claims
  • Academy turning on Thomas Nagel big time, for not spouting nonsense against design in nature
  • Neanderthals’ big eyes made them less intelligent? Really?
Sponsored Links
Popular Posts
  • 10 + 1 Questions For Professor Myers (14,981)
  • A Whale of a Problem for Evolution: Ancient Whale Jawbone Found in Antartica (13,406)
  • UB Sets It Out Step-By-Step (12,483)
  • A world-famous chemist tells the truth: there’s no scientist alive today who understands macroevolution (8,877)
  • Richard Dawkins On His Recent Encounter With John Lennox (Updated) (7,486)
©Uncommon Descent, Inc., Barry K. Arrington, President
Powered by WordPress and The Clear Line Theme