Subscribe RSS
 
benefits of prozac and how to buy prozac you can use a credit card prozacs advantages and how to order buy prozac online and read here buy lexapro online without a prescription is no longer a problem buy lasix buy citalopram Lexapro answer your qestions
  • Home
  • News Desk
  • Other ID News
  • Resources
    • Frequently Raised, but Weak Arguments Against ID
    • ID Defined
    • Glossary
    • Video Archive
  • Archives
  • Comment Policy
    • Moderation
    • Put a Sock In It
  • About

Monthly Archives: May 2005

To Stop Evolution: New Way Of Fighting Antibiotic Resistance Demonstrated By Scripps Scientists

May 23, 2005 Posted by William Dembski under Evolution
10 Comments

Biologists have often thought about evolution in the same way many think about death and taxes — something inevitable. But Romesberg is a chemist, and he found himself asking not only how, but why evolution happens. more

Christianity Today’s 2005 Book Awards

May 22, 2005 Posted by William Dembski under Intelligent Design, Religion, Science
5 Comments

Two ID books were selected among Christianity Today’s 2005 Book Awards: in the category of Apologetics/Evangelism, Lee Strobel’s The Case for a Creator; in the category Christianity & Culture, my book The Design Revolution (another of my books Intelligent Design: The Bridge Between Science and Theology received that same award in 2000). Awards like this… more

Dawkins on Kansas in the London Times

May 21, 2005 Posted by William Dembski under Darwinism, Evolution, Intelligent Design
3 Comments

“intelligent design theory” (ID) … its propagandists are slick, superficially plausible and, above all, well financed. more

Sorry, kids, but you’re just too stupid

May 21, 2005 Posted by William Dembski under Education, Evolution, Intelligent Design
16 Comments

The only reason for raising such questions before state education authorities is not to deepen the scientific understanding of teenagers but rather to sow deliberate confusion. more

Letters following up on Nature’s recent ID feature

May 21, 2005 Posted by William Dembski under Evolution, Intelligent Design
4 Comments

to be effective in its support, the scientific community needs to understand the empirical claims of ID more

Springsteen vs. Dylan

May 20, 2005 Posted by William Dembski under Evolution
1 Comment

They got Charles Darwin trapped out there on Highway Five
Judge says to the High Sheriff,
“I want him dead or alive
Either one, I don’t care.” more

ASA on ID and Evolution

May 20, 2005 Posted by William Dembski under Education, Evolution, Intelligent Design
2 Comments

Scientific criticism of evolution should not be muted for fear of being labeled a creationist. more

Evolutionary Logic

May 19, 2005 Posted by William Dembski under Darwinism, Evolution
5 Comments

Evolutionary logic has a further advantage, namely, the results are not required to be true, thus eliminating a tiresome (and now superfluous) restriction on the growth of evolutionary knowledge. more

Denis Alexander on ID

May 19, 2005 Posted by William Dembski under Intelligent Design, Religion, Science
11 Comments

Denis Alexander is a molecular biologist with very solid credentials who is based at Cambridge University. He is also a theistic evolutionist who has written several books on the relation between science and Christian faith. His most recent is Rebuilding the Matrix (with Zondervan). Even though he is a critic of ID, he helped one… more

“The Design Inference” — Coming to paperback in 6 months

May 19, 2005 Posted by William Dembski under Intelligent Design
3 Comments

I just learned from my editor at Cambridge University Press that The Design Inference is going to be issued in paperback in the next 6 months. This is good news. When the book came out in 1998, it listed at $55. I believe it is now up to $85. This will take the price down… more

Dembski on “No Free Lunch”

May 18, 2005 Posted by William Dembski under Darwinism, Evolution, Intelligent Design
No Comments

The New Yorker is doing a major piece on intelligent design next week written by Allen Orr more

Neither Matter Nor Magic But Mind

May 18, 2005 Posted by William Dembski under Education, Evolution, Intelligent Design, Science
20 Comments

The key is to understand that the nature-supernature distinction poses a false dilemma. There is a third option. more

Templeton Foundation Enlists Journalists into Its Science-Religion Discussion

May 18, 2005 Posted by William Dembski under Religion, Science
No Comments

Looking for 10 Fine Journalists Setting Up the Templeton-Cambridge Journalism Fellowships in Science and Religion By Julia Vitullo-Martin “It’s a pleasure to meet a man who’s got an asteroid named after him,” said Cathy Lynn Grossman, the religion correspondent for USA Today, extending her hand to Owen Gingerich, research professor of astronomy at Harvard and… more

Kansas School Board to Decide over Definition of Science

May 18, 2005 Posted by William Dembski under Education, Science
2 Comments

Check out the following stories at MSNBC and World Magazine: go here and here respectively. more

Kauffman, Roszak, Dobbs — Opening Up The Discussion

May 17, 2005 Posted by William Dembski under Darwinism, Evolution, Intelligent Design
2 Comments

I gave the entire Washington Post article on Phil Johnson here two days ago (go here). I want to draw your attention to two quotes in that article, one by Stuart Kauffman, the other by Theo Roszak. Kauffman is a well known self-organizational theorist. Roszak was a popular countercultural figure two and three decades ago… more

This Has Got to Be Disheartening to Darwinists

May 17, 2005 Posted by William Dembski under Education
5 Comments

Which statements reflect your views on the origin of human beings? 1. We evolved from less advanced life forms over millions of years, and God did not directly guide this process. 2. We evolved from less advanced life forms over millions of years, but God guided this process. 3. God created us in our present… more

The Vise Strategy II: Essence of the Strategy

May 16, 2005 Posted by William Dembski under Darwinism, Evolution, Intelligent Design
20 Comments

Over a decade ago, Phillip Johnson, in his public lectures, used to describe his critique of evolutionary naturalism as encapsulated in an analysis of three words: science, evolution, and creation. According to Johnson, by suitably equivocating about the meaning of these words, Darwinists were able to confuse the public and themselves into consenting to a… more

A Brave Editor’s Note

May 15, 2005 Posted by William Dembski under Darwinism, Education, Intelligent Design
1 Comment

In the eye of the Brazilian Darwinian hurricane more

ID in Opus

May 15, 2005 Posted by William Dembski under Intelligent Design
No Comments

more

Today’s Washington Post Article on Phil Johnson

May 15, 2005 Posted by William Dembski under Darwinism, Evolution, Intelligent Design
No Comments

Doubting Rationalist ‘Intelligent Design’ Proponent Phillip Johnson, and How He Came to Be http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2005/05/14/AR2005051401222_pf.html By Michael Powell Washington Post Staff Writer Sunday, May 15, 2005; D01 more

« Previous Page — Next Page »
Archives
  • May 2013
  • April 2013
  • March 2013
  • February 2013
  • January 2013
  • December 2012
  • November 2012
  • October 2012
  • September 2012
  • August 2012
  • July 2012
  • June 2012
  • May 2012
  • April 2012
  • March 2012
  • February 2012
  • January 2012
  • December 2011
  • November 2011
  • October 2011
  • September 2011
  • August 2011
  • July 2011
  • June 2011
  • May 2011
  • April 2011
  • March 2011
  • February 2011
  • January 2011
  • December 2010
  • November 2010
  • October 2010
  • September 2010
  • August 2010
  • July 2010
  • June 2010
  • May 2010
  • April 2010
  • March 2010
  • February 2010
  • January 2010
  • December 2009
  • November 2009
  • October 2009
  • September 2009
  • August 2009
  • July 2009
  • June 2009
  • May 2009
  • April 2009
  • March 2009
  • February 2009
  • January 2009
  • December 2008
  • November 2008
  • October 2008
  • September 2008
  • August 2008
  • July 2008
  • June 2008
  • May 2008
  • April 2008
  • March 2008
  • February 2008
  • January 2008
  • December 2007
  • November 2007
  • October 2007
  • September 2007
  • August 2007
  • July 2007
  • June 2007
  • May 2007
  • April 2007
  • March 2007
  • February 2007
  • January 2007
  • December 2006
  • November 2006
  • October 2006
  • September 2006
  • August 2006
  • July 2006
  • June 2006
  • May 2006
  • April 2006
  • March 2006
  • February 2006
  • January 2006
  • December 2005
  • November 2005
  • October 2005
  • September 2005
  • August 2005
  • July 2005
  • June 2005
  • May 2005
  • April 2005
Recent Posts
  • An insurrection against “journal impact factors” in science?
  • A corrective to some remarks regarding first principles of reason, showing that such first principles are just that . . .
  • Not only is there no scientific method, but biology does not need math – says prominent evolutionary biologist
  • Is the Intelligent Designer an interventionist? A reply to Felsenstein and Liddle
  • Is it true that there is no scientific method, as cosmologist Lee Smolin suggests?
Popular Posts
  • 10 + 1 Questions For Professor Myers (14,978)
  • A Whale of a Problem for Evolution: Ancient Whale Jawbone Found in Antartica (13,334)
  • UB Sets It Out Step-By-Step (12,476)
  • A world-famous chemist tells the truth: there’s no scientist alive today who understands macroevolution (8,767)
  • Richard Dawkins On His Recent Encounter With John Lennox (Updated) (7,380)
©Uncommon Descent, Inc., Barry K. Arrington, President
Powered by WordPress and The Clear Line Theme